Law Database of Malaysia

   Home    Subscription   Products & Services    Contact Us    Feedback    Job Postings    Advertise With Us   .
Latest Promotions


Other Promotions
Malaysian Current Law Journal Book List
image_nil.jpg (50873 bytes) Selangor, Penang, Perak, Johore & Malacca State Enactments
clj2010.jpg (30889 bytes) CLJ Subscription 2012
image_nil.jpg (15182 bytes) Acts of Parliament
Other Malaysian Law Sites
(Separate subscription required to login)
Arbitration Medical Law
Banking Law Maritime Law
Company Law Public Law
Criminal Law Land Law
Family Law Tax Law
Labour Law Tort
Intellectual Property
Having problems while using our online facilities? Call/SMS our HOTLINE: 019-2505400 - 24/7. Please state username.

CLICK here to view SMC sample    Click here to subscribe

Case Highlights

Extempore Judgment of the KL War Crimes Tribunal
Chief Prosecutor of The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission v. George W Bush & Anthony L. Blair
Also read:
  Press Release by KL War Crimes Tribunal
  Article: Kuala Lumpur Tribunal: Bush and Blair guilty by Richard Falk, Al Jazeera

BANKRUPTCY
Fraudulent debtor - Punishment - Guarantor for loan facility while being an undischarged bankrupt - Bankruptcy order - Annulment of - Whether annulment of bankruptcy order puts respondent in position as if there was no adjudication - Effect of - Whether respondent informed bank that he was an undischarged bankrupt before being a guarantor - Bankruptcy Act 1967, s. 109(1)(m)(ii)
PP v. Dato´ Suhaili Abdul Rahman
(Raus Sharif FCJ, Sulong Matjeraie, Mohamed Apandi Ali JJCA) [2012] 1 CLJ 301 [CA]

ARBITRATION
Arbitration clause - Construction of - Plaintiff sought to register and enforce Russian arbitration award against Malaysian defendant - Defendant alleged arbitral procedure in contract not followed - Arbitration clause enabled defendant to file claim in Ukraine tribunal and plaintiff to file in Russian tribunal - Defendant first to file for arbitration - Whether this ousted plaintiff&acuts right to file claim in Moscow tribunal - Whether subject matter before each tribunal different - Whether against public policy to enforce award - Arbitration Act 2005, ss. 38 & 39
Open Type Joint Stock Company Efirnoye (´Efko´) v. Alfa Trading Ltd
(Nallini Pathmanathan J) [2012] 1 CLJ 323 [HC]

Article

Computing Professionals Bill 2011 – Ambiguity, Arbitrariness and Uncertainty
(Used with permission) by Foong Cheng Leong & Joachim Leong

There has been a public outcry on the Computing Professionals Bill. Some of the fears are unfounded while others, quite genuine. Foong Cheng Leong, an IT lawyer and Joachim Leong, a non-practicing lawyer cum Consultant for Denning IT dissect the Bill. In their views, the main concerns lie at how the Critical National Information Infrastructure (CNII) is being widely and ambiguously defined, the powers the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) has over the Computing Professionals Board, the need for government regulation in the information technology industry and its implications on the public at large.

 
INTRODUCTION by Sundra Rajoo, Director, Kuala Lumpur Regional Centre for Arbitration
(Extract from The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2012. Used with kind permission of the Global Arbitration Review)
Arbitral practice in 2011 continued its march towards universal application. The main reason behind the rise and popularity of the alternative dispute resolution process with the ability to transcend national boundaries lies with enforcement efficacy enabled by the New York Convention, parties having autonomy on the procedures and the choice of arbitrator, reduced interference and influences from the government, judiciary and political will of a particular nation and numerous other positive attributes including confidentiality.

CASE OF THE WEEK

LEMBAGA KUMPULAN WANG SIMPANAN PEKERJA v. AZIMUDDIN AB GHANI & ORS
HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
LEE SWEE SENG JC
[CIVIL SUIT NO: S-21-2-2006]
10 MARCH 2011

COMPANY LAW: Directors - Personal liability - Whether directors of company jointly and severally liable for EPF contributions due and payable - Company under scheme of rearrangement under s. 176(1) of Companies Act 1965 - Whether s. 46 of Employees Provident Fund Act 1991 unconstitutional

PROVIDENT FUND: Arrears of contribution - Recovery of arrears of EPF contributions - Whether directors of company jointly and severally liable for EPF contributions due and payable - Company under scheme of rearrangement under s. 176(1) of Companies Act 1965 - Whether EPF officer concerned duly authorised to certify amount outstanding and to commence action - Employees Provident Fund Act 1991, ss. 46 & 64

PROVIDENT FUND: Liability of employer - Directors of company - Whether directors of company jointly and severally liable for EPF contributions due and payable - Company under scheme of rearrangement under s. 176(1) of Companies Act 1965 - Whether s. 46 of Employees Provident Fund Act 1991 unconstitutional

Login
  Username

Password

Remember my ID
Subscribe to us
Trouble Logging in
CLJ Law Resources
Publish Your Work With Us
Submit A Case
Legislation: An Overview
Latest Malaysian Acts
Latest Malaysian Bills
Goods and Services Tax Bill 2009
GST & You (The Sun)
Industrial Law Resources
(Courtesy of Industrial Court)
Cases Hearing Schedule
e - Industrial Court Search
BULLETINS
    Latest CLJ Bulletin
    Latest Labour Law Bulletin
    CLJ Bulletin Archives
    ILR/Labour Law Bulletin Archives

Emails sent to you weekly with the latest updates on the law.
Sign up for the FREE weekly CLJ Bulletin & Labourlaw Bulletin today!
Legal News

Former Penang Immigration director ordered to defend graft charge

Religion status case remitted to high court

Fernandes: Lawsuit will not affect AirAsia sales

Firm told it has no grounds to appeal in case against Mindef

IWK suing Yayasan Selangor over sewerage charges

Teoh´s brother can appeal coroner´s open verdict

Federal Court can review Court of Appeal´s decisions

Court sets April 4 for trial in NFC case

High Court dismisses suit against Mahadevan

Iranian ordered to enter defence on drug charge

Pakistan PM faces top court contempt hearing

French lawmakers seek rejection of genocide law

German court upholds ban of Samsung´s older Tablet

Thai police seek court order to hold Hezbollah suspect

 
 
About Us   Disclaimer   Privacy Policy   Terms of Trade   Terms & Conditions of Use   Contact Us 
Copyright © 1997-2012   CLJ Legal Network Sdn Bhd (192353 V)   Email: enquiries@cljlaw.com   Tel: 03-4270 5421(D/L) 03-4270 5400   Fax: 03-4270 5402