Back to Top

Issue #6/2018
08 February 2018

To get the most out of this law bulletin and have full access to judgments and other materials, subscribe to CLJLaw today.

Feel free to forward this bulletin to your colleagues. Sign-up to receive this bulletin directly via email.

New This Week

  1. Case(s) of the Week

    1. DINESH KANAVAJI KANAWAGI & ANOR v. RAGUMAREN N GOPAL; MAJLIS PEGUAM (INTERVENER) [2018] 2 CLJ 1

  2. Latest Cases

    1. Legal Network Series

    2. CLJ 2018 Volume 2 (Part 1)

  3. Articles

    1. LNS Article(s)

  4. Legislation Highlights

    1. Principal Acts

    2. Amending Acts

    3. PU(A)

    4. PU(B)

    5. Legislation Alert

CASE(S) OF THE WEEK

DINESH KANAVAJI KANAWAGI & ANOR v.
RAGUMAREN N GOPAL; MAJLIS PEGUAM (INTERVENER)
[2018] 2 CLJ 1
FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA
MD RAUS SHARIF CJ; AHMAD MAAROP CJ (MALAYA); AZAHAR MOHAMED FCJ; ZAHARAH IBRAHIM FCJ; PRASAD SANDOSHAM ABRAHAM FCJ
[CIVIL APPEAL NO: 02(F)-65-10-2015 (W)]
29 NOVEMBER 2017

LEGAL PROFESSION: Roll of Advocates and Solicitors - Struck off - Appeal against - Disciplinary Board made order for appellants to be struck off Rolls of Advocates and Solicitors at conclusion of disciplinary proceedings - Allegation of serious misconduct - Whether Disciplinary Committee forwarded record of investigation proceeding to Director of complaints as required by r. 26(2) of Legal Profession (Disciplinary Proceedings) (Investigating Tribunal and Disciplinary Committee) Rules 1994 - Whether Disciplinary Committee's report complied with provisions of Legal Profession Act 1976 - Whether power to call persons to give oral evidence vests with Disciplinary Committee - Whether procedure conducted by Disciplinary Committee fair - Whether appellants must be judged by peers - Whether alleged unlawful acts committed in professional capacity - Whether conduct unbefitting of advocate and solicitor within definition of 'misconduct' - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 94(3)(o) - Whether recommendation to be struck off Roll harsh - Principle of proportionality in meting out sentences - Whether applicable

WORDS & PHRASES: 'in a professional capacity or otherwise' - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 94(3) - Whether word 'otherwise' wide enough to include acts or omissions in any capacity other than as advocate and solicitor

WORDS & PHRASES: 'misconduct' - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 94(3) - Whether includes circumstances set out in s. 94(3)(a) to (o) - Whether conduct unbefitting of advocate and solicitor within definition of 'misconduct'


LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2016] 1 LNS 946

PP lwn. ANUAR AB RAWI

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Penghukuman - Mitigasi - Pertuduhan di bawah s. 130JB(1)(a) Kanun Keseksaan - Kesalahan memiliki material yang berkaitan dengan perbuatan pengganas - Pengakuan bersalah - Kesalahan pertama - Tertuduh mendakwa telah insaf - Tertuduh merupakan seorang imam dan pendakwah - Sama ada faktor utama yang perlu diberi penekanan adalah faktor kepentingan awam - Sama ada sebarang kesalahan yang berkaitan dengan keganasan adalah serius - Sama ada mahkamah perlu mengekang fenomena keganasan demi kemakmuran dan kestabilan negara

[2016] 1 LNS 955

ISHAK AHMAD lwn. PENTADBIR TANAH BENTONG

UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH: Pengambilan - Pampasan - Nilai tanah - Penentuan nilai tanah - Nilai pembangunan tanah - Tanah ditanam kelapa sawit dan durian - Sama ada jumlah pampasan nilai tanah dibayar terlalu rendah berbanding nilai pasaran sebenar - Sama ada lokaliti perbandingan penilai kerajaan dan penilai swasta terletak di lokasi yang sama - Sama ada harga pasaran bagi tanah yang ditanam dengan kelapa sawit dan durian mempunyai julat harga yang melebihi 100% - Sama ada nilai pembangunan tanah yang diambil dan dibayar adalah merupakan pembayaran dua kali terhadap nilai tanah - Sama ada faktor pecah pisah perlu dipertimbangkan apabila pengasingan tanah menjadi lebih baik - Sama ada bahagian menghadap jalan utama yang ada pembangunan adalah bernilai lebih tinggi

[2016] 1 LNS 1373

ESPARO SDN BHD v. BANK PERTANIAN MALAYSIA BERHAD (NO 2)

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Interlocutory injunction - Interlocutory prohibitory injunction - Application for interlocutory prohibitory injunction filed by plaintiff - Defendant filed an application for striking out main suit which was allowed - Whether interlocutory prohibitory injunction could still be considered if striking out application was allowed - Whether interlocutory prohibitory injunction would collapse if main suit is struck out

[2016] 1 LNS 1376

PUNNIYAMOORTHY PERUMAL & ANOR v. MOHD SYAHIR AZHAR

DAMAGES: Appeal - Appeal against award made - Personal injuries - Right shoulder and flank friction burn injury (TBSA 4%) with disabilities - Burn injury with scars could be corrected through surgery - Non-permanent injury - Trial judge awarded RM60,000 - Whether an award of RM40,000 was reasonable

DAMAGES: Appeal - Appeal against award made - Personal injuries - Right 2nd to 4th ribs with right pneumothorax - Trial judge awarded RM30,000 - Whether an award for each rib ranged from RM3,500 to RM4,500 - Whether an award of RM27,000 was reasonable

DAMAGES: Appeal - Appeal against award made - Personal injuries - Closed fracture of scapula - Trial judge awarded RM18,000 - Whether an award for dislocation of acromio-clavicular joint ranged from RM11,000 to RM19,000 - Whether an award of RM15,000 was reasonable

DAMAGES: Appeal - Appeal against award made - Personal injuries - Right eye subconjunctival hemorrhage with diplopia - Trial judge awarded global sum of RM22,000 - Whether a global award of RM19,500 was reasonable

[2016] 1 LNS 1444

PER: ALFRED LAM CHOONG CHOY; EX-PARTE : DOWNTOWN CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY & OTHER CASE

BANKRUPTCY: Jurisdiction - Jurisdiction of court - Jurisdiction to hear bankruptcy proceedings - Judgment debtor not present in Malaysia at time bankruptcy proceedings commenced - Whether judgement debtor was a 'debtor' under s. 3(3) of Bankruptcy Act - Whether judgment creditor's petition had satisfied relevant criteria in s. 5(1)(d) of Bankruptcy Act

BANKRUPTCY: Creditor's petition - Opposition to - Challenge made to statements made in creditor's petition - Judgment debtor failed to file notice to show cause and notice of application within 3 days before hearing of creditor's petition pursuant to r. 117 Bankruptcy Rules - Whether failure to adhere to statutory requirements to dispute creditor's petition pursuant to r. 117 Bankruptcy Rules was fatal

BANKRUPTCY: Creditor's petition - Opposition to - Allegation creditor's petition and affidavit in support signed and affirmed by unauthorised person - Bankruptcy proceedings commenced by a joint management body - Creditors petition filed by management agent of joint management body - Whether requirement of s. 133(a) of Bankrupcy Act and r. 215 of Bankruptcy Rules satisfied - Whether creditor's petition and affidavit in support were signed and affirmed by an authorised person

BANKRUPTCY: Setting aside - Application to set aside - Setting aside of bankruptcy notice and creditor's petition - Wrong mode of commencement - Setting aside application was filed by way of notice of application instead of summons in chambers - Whether application contravened r. 18 of Bankruptcy Rules


CLJ 2018 Volume 2 (Part 1)

FEDERAL COURT

Dinesh Kanavaji Kanawagi & Anor v. Ragumaren N Gopal; Majlis Peguam (Intervener)
Md Raus Sharif CJ, Ahmad Maarop CJ (Malaya), Azahar Mohamed, Zaharah Ibrahim, Prasad Sandosham Abraham FCJJ
(Legal Profession; Words & Phrases - Roll of Advocates and Solicitors - Struck off - Appeal against - Principle of proportionality in meting out sentences) [2018] 2 CLJ 1 [FC]

COURT OF APPEAL

Agbu Goodluck Ugochukwu lwn. PP
Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Idrus Harun, Yaacob Md Sam HHMR
(Prosedur Jenayah; Keterangan - Rayuan - Perayu disabitkan kesalahan mengedar dadah dan dijatuhkan hukuman mati - Sama ada sabitan dan hukuman selamat) [2018] 2 CLJ 30 [CA]

Ahmad Marsidi Ismail v. PP
Mohtarudin Baki, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Ab Karim Ab Jalil JJCA
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Drugs found under passenger's seat of car - Whether smell from cannabis connoted knowledge) [2018] 2 CLJ 53 [CA]

Norihan Talib & Ors v. Mohd Nasir Hassan & Ors And Another Appeal
Abang Iskandar, Mary Lim JJCA, Suraya Othman J
(Civil Procedure - Setting aside - Statement of claim - Recovery of monies paid in investment scheme) [2018] 2 CLJ 66 [CA]

Tan Wei Hong & Ors v. Malaysia Airlines System Bhd & Ors
Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA
(Civil Procedure - Striking out - Claim for negligence for causing disappearance and presumptive death by dependents of deceased persons on board flight MH370) [2018] 2 CLJ 84 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Dato' Seri Timor Shah Rafiq v. Nautilus Tug & Towage Sdn Bhd
Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali J
(Company Law - Accounts - Rights of inspection as director - Whether director obliged to provide reason for request) [2018] 2 CLJ 103 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Setting aside - Statement of claim - Recovery of monies paid in investment scheme - Application to set aside action - Whether investment scheme illegal - Whether scheme contravened Financial Services Act 2013 and Direct Selling Act 1993 - Whether claim disclosed reasonable cause of action - High Court's order granting application for Mareva injunction - Whether claim should be allowed since court already granted mareva injunction after finding that there was good arguable case - Whether claim founded on illegal and unlawful scheme could be enforced
Norihan Talib & Ors v. Mohd Nasir Hassan & Ors And Another Appeal
(Abang Iskandar, Mary Lim JJCA, Suraya Othman J) [2018] 2 CLJ 66 [CA]

Striking out - Statement of claim - Claim for negligence for causing disappearance and presumptive death by dependents of deceased persons on board flight MH370 - Whether matters pleaded in statement of claim sustainable or raised reasonable cause of action - Whether High Court Judge erred in striking out appellants' action against third, fourth and fifth respondents
Tan Wei Hong & Ors v. Malaysia Airlines System Bhd & Ors
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2018] 2 CLJ 84 [CA]

COMPANY LAW

Accounts - Inspection, application for - Rights of inspection as director - Whether director entitled to inspect accounts - Whether rights unfettered - Whether right to inspect connected to discharge of director's duties - Whether right not available if bad faith proved - Whether director obliged to provide reason for request - Whether requirements of s. 167(6) of Companies Act 1965 complied with
Dato' Seri Timor Shah Rafiq v. Nautilus Tug & Towage Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali J) [2018] 2 CLJ 103 [HC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (`DDA') - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking in 973g of cannabis - Drugs found under passenger's seat of accused's car - Whether accused had custody and control of drugs - Whether smell from cannabis connoted knowledge of cannabis in car - Findings of trial judge that accused had mens rea possession of drugs without recourse to presumption under s. 37(d) of DDA - Presumption of trafficking under s. 37(da) of DDA based on weight of drugs seized - Accused sentenced to death - Case of PP v. Abdul Rahman Akif - Whether applicable - Whether conviction and sentence safe - Whether ought to be substituted with conviction under s. 6 of DDA punishable under s. 39A(2) of DDA
Ahmad Marsidi Ismail v. PP
(Mohtarudin Baki, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Ab Karim Ab Jalil JJCA) [2018] 2 CLJ 53 [CA]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Drugs found under passenger's seat of accused's car - Whether accused had custody and control of drugs - Whether smell from cannabis connoted knowledge of cannabis in car - Whether trial judge erred in finding that accused had mens rea possession of drugs without recourse to presumption under s. 37(d) of DDA - Whether trial judge erred in finding that accused had knowledge of drugs based on smell emanating from drugs - Whether conviction and sentence safe - Whether ought to be set aside
Ahmad Marsidi Ismail v. PP
(Mohtarudin Baki, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal, Ab Karim Ab Jalil JJCA) [2018] 2 CLJ 53 [CA]

LEGAL PROFESSION

Roll of Advocates and Solicitors - Struck off - Appeal against - Disciplinary Board made order for appellants to be struck off Rolls of Advocates and Solicitors at conclusion of disciplinary proceedings - Allegation of serious misconduct - Whether Disciplinary Committee forwarded record of investigation proceeding to Director of complaints as required by r. 26(2) of Legal Profession (Disciplinary Proceedings) (Investigating Tribunal and Disciplinary Committee) Rules 1994 - Whether Disciplinary Committee's report complied with provisions of Legal Profession Act 1976 - Whether power to call persons to give oral evidence vests with Disciplinary Committee - Whether procedure conducted by Disciplinary Committee fair - Whether appellants must be judged by peers - Whether alleged unlawful acts committed in professional capacity - Whether conduct unbefitting of advocate and solicitor within definition of `misconduct' - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 94(3)(o) - Whether recommendation to be struck off Roll harsh - Principle of proportionality in meting out sentences - Whether applicable
Dinesh Kanavaji Kanawagi & Anor v. Ragumaren N Gopal; Majlis Peguam (Intervener)
(Md Raus Sharif CJ, Ahmad Maarop CJ (Malaya), Azahar Mohamed, Zaharah Ibrahim, Prasad Sandosham Abraham FCJJ) [2018] 2 CLJ 1 [FC]

WORDS & PHRASES

'in a professional capacity or otherwise' - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 94(3) - Whether word `otherwise' wide enough to include acts or omissions in any capacity other than as advocate and solicitor
Dinesh Kanavaji Kanawagi & Anor v. Ragumaren N Gopal; Majlis Peguam (Intervener)
(Md Raus Sharif CJ, Ahmad Maarop CJ (Malaya), Azahar Mohamed, Zaharah Ibrahim, Prasad Sandosham Abraham FCJJ) [2018] 2 CLJ 1 [FC]

`misconduct' - Legal Profession Act 1976, s. 94(3) - Whether includes circumstances set out in s. 94(3)(a) to (o) - Whether conduct unbefitting of advocate and solicitor within definition of `misconduct'
Dinesh Kanavaji Kanawagi & Anor v. Ragumaren N Gopal; Majlis Peguam (Intervener)
(Md Raus Sharif CJ, Ahmad Maarop CJ (Malaya), Azahar Mohamed, Zaharah Ibrahim, Prasad Sandosham Abraham FCJJ) [2018] 2 CLJ 1 [FC]

INDEKS PERKARA

KETERANGAN

Anggapan bertentangan - Kegagalan memanggil saksi material - Perayu disabitkan kesalahan mengedar dadah dan dijatuhkan hukuman mati - Dadah dijumpai di dalam bilik di rumah sewa - Kegagalan memanggil penghuni bilik tempat dadah dijumpai - Sama ada menjejaskan kes pendakwaan - Sama ada sabitan dan hukuman selamat - Sama ada anggapan bertentangan wajar dibangkitkan - Akta Keterangan 1950, s. 114(g)
Agbu Goodluck Ugochukwu lwn. PP
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Idrus Harun, Yaacob Md Sam HHMR) [2018] 2 CLJ 30 [CA]

PROSEDUR JENAYAH

Rayuan - Rayuan terhadap sabitan dan hukuman - Dadah dijumpai di dalam bilik di rumah sewa - Sama ada dadah dijumpai di dalam bilik perayu - Sama ada pakaian yang dijumpai di dalam bilik adalah milik perayu - Perayu disabitkan kesalahan mengedar dadah dan dijatuhkan hukuman mati - Keraguan tempat pakaian dirampas - Sama ada DNA perayu pada pakaian membentuk keterangan sokongan - Sama ada perayu terprejudis - Sama ada sabitan dan hukuman selamat - Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952, ss. 39B(1)(a) & (2)
Agbu Goodluck Ugochukwu lwn. PP
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Idrus Harun, Yaacob Md Sam HHMR) [2018] 2 CLJ 30 [CA]


ARTICLES

LNS Article(s)

  1. INITIAL COIN OFFERING — A QUICK LOOK* [Read excerpt]
    by: BRIAN LYE MOU-YU** [2018] 1 LNS(A) x

  2. [2018] 1 LNS(A) x
    logo
    MALAYSIA

    INITIAL COIN OFFERING — A QUICK LOOK*
    by
    BRIAN LYE MOU-YU**

    What are digital 'tokens'?

    A digital token is created and cryptographically secured through blockchain as part of a decentralised digital protocol. Each token is a unit representation of the token holder's right to receive a benefit or due performance of a specific function.

    There are many different types of tokens, each with varying characteristics and utility. One particular function of a token is currency, like Bitcoin and Ether. While these tokens can serve as a digital medium for transactions, the tokens may also represent a right to tangible assets like luxury goods, commodities or real property in the form of a smart contract.

    . . .

    * This article is reproduced, with permission, from the Legal Herald (November 2017), a publication by Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill, Advocates & Solicitors, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    **Brian Lye Mou-Yu (blm@lh-ag.com).


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
  3. SAMA ADA PENGGANTUNGAN PELAKSANAAN PERINTAH BOLEH DI BERIKAN OLEH "MAHKAMAH BURUH"? [Read excerpt]
    by: RHYMIE BIN MOHD RAMLI* [2018] 1 LNS(A) xiii

  4. [2018] 1 LNS(A) xiii
    logo
    MALAYSIA

    SAMA ADA PENGGANTUNGAN PELAKSANAAN PERINTAH BOLEH DI BERIKAN OLEH "MAHKAMAH BURUH"?
    by
    RHYMIE BIN MOHD RAMLI*

    "Mahkamah Buruh" merujuk kepada kuasa menyiasat dan memutuskan aduan yang dibuat di bawah Sekseyn 77 Akta tersebut.

    Artikel ini ditulis bertujuan untuk menganalisis persoalan undang-undang iaitu sama ada "Mahkamah Buruh mempunyai bidang kuasa bagi mempertimbangkan penggantungan pelaksanaan sementara rayuan diputuskan. Sebelum menjawab persoalan tersebut, adalah wajar untuk menjelaskan apakah yang dimaksudkan sebagai penggantungan pelaksanaan.

    . . .

    * LL.B (Hons) UIAM, Pengamal Undang-Undang Pekerjaan.


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title In force from Repealing
ACT 801 Finance (No. 2) Act 2017 As provided in the Act except s 20 - 23; 1 January 2018 [PU(B) 610/2017] - s 20, 21 and 23; 1 October 2018 [PU(B) 610/2017] - s 22 -
ACT 800 Employment Insurance System Act 2017 1 January 2018 [PU(B) 606/2017] -
ACT 799 Malaysian Border Security Agency Act 2017 29 December 2017 [PU(B) 595/2017] -
ACT 798 Local Authorities (Conditions of Service) Act 1964 (Revised 2017) 15 November 2017 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 November 2017; First enacted in 1968 as Act of Parliament No 9 of 1964 -
ACT 797 Sabah Ports Authority (Consequential Provisions) Act 1968 (Revised 2017) 15 November 2017 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 November 2017; First enacted in 1968 as Act No 25 of 1968 -

Amending Acts

Number Title In force from Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1563 Arbitration (Amendment) Act 2018 Not Yet In Force ACT 646
ACT A1562 Tourism Industry (Amendment) Act 2018 Not Yet In Force ACT 482
ACT A1561 Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (Amendment) Act 2018 11 January 2018 ACT 633
ACT A1560 Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (Amendment) Act 2018 11 January 2018 ACT 617
ACT A1559 Malaysian Aviation Commission (Amendment) Act 2018 9 February 2018 [PU(B) 66/2018] ACT 771

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(A) 21/2018 Road Transport (Slow Moving Vehicles) (Prohibition On Use of Road) (City of Kuala Lumpur) (Amendment) Order 2018 5 February 2018 7 February 2018 PU(A) 400/1994
PU(A) 20/2018 Labuan Business Activity Tax (Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information) Regulations 2018 5 February 2018 1 July 2017 ACT 445
PU(A) 19/2018 Price Control and Anti-Profiteering (Determination of Maximum Retail Price For Petrol and Diesel) (No. 5) Order 2018 31 January 2018 1 February 2018 ACT 723
PU(A) 18/2018 Road Transport (Prohibition of Use of Road) (Federal Roads) (No. 3) Order 2018 30 January 2018 5 February 2018 ACT 333
PU(A) 17/2018 Road Transport (Prohibition of Use of Road) (Federal Roads) (No. 2) Order 2018 30 January 2018 5 February 2018 ACT 333

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(B) 66/2018 Appointment of Date of Coming Into Operation 6 February 2018 7 February 2018 ACT A1559
PU(B) 58/2018 Revocation of Reservation of Land For Public Purpose For Lot 55134 Mukim Kuala Lumpur 30 January 2018 31 January 2018 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 57/2018 Revocation of Reservation of Land For Public Purpose For Lot 5108 Mukim Hulu Kelang 30 January 2018 31 January 2018 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 56/2018 Notice of Proposed Revocation of Reservation of Land For Public Purpose For Lot 48670 Mukim Kuala Lumpur 30 January 2018 31 January 2018 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 55/2018 Notification of Values of Crude Petroleum Oil Under Section 12 30 January 2018 1 February 2018 to 14 February 2018 ACT 235

Legislation Alert

Updated

Act/Principal No. Title Amended by In force from Section amended
ACT 771 Malaysian Aviation Commission Act 2015 ACT A1559 9 February 2018 [PU(B) 66/2018] Sections 2, 18, 36, 65, 66, 69, 98 and 98A
PU(A) 37/2017 Companies Regulations 2017 PU(A) 15/2018 1 February 2018 Schedule
ACT 778 Interest Schemes Act 2016 PU(A) 14/2018 31 January 2018 Second Schedule
ACT 614 Companies Commission of Malaysia Act 2001 PU(A) 13/2018 1 February 2018 First Schedule
ACT 246 Private Employment Agencies Act 1981 ACT A1554 1 February 2018 [PU(B) 50/2018] Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9A, 9B, 10, 11, 11A, 13, 13A, 13B, 13C, 13D, 13E, 13F, 13G, 14, 14A, 14B, 14C, 14D, 14E, 14F, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 19A, 20, 21, 22, 24 25, 26, 27, 27A, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, First Schedule and Second Schedule

Revoked

Act/Principal No. Title Revoked by In force from
PU(A) 214/1981 Private Employment Agencies Regulations 1981 PU(A) 16/2018 1 February 2018
PU(A) 79/2015 Price Control and Anti-Profiteering (Marking of Service Charge For Hotel and Restaurant) Order 2015 PU(A) 9/2018 25 January 2018
PU(B) 174/2017 Appointment of Date of Coming Into Operation of Rent of Parcel Or Provisional Block PU(B) 611/2017 30 December 2017
PU(B) 133/2015 Appointment of Member of the Competition Commission PU(B) 585/2017 1 October 2017 to 30 September 2020
PU(A) 161/2017 Co-operative Societies (Assumption of Control) (Appointment) Order 2017 PU(A) 331/2017 19 June 2017