Issue #36/2018
06 September 2018
|
To get the most out of this law bulletin and have full access to judgments and other materials, subscribe to CLJLaw today.
Feel free to forward this bulletin to your colleagues. Sign-up to receive this bulletin directly via email.
New This Week
|
ONG SIEW HWA v. UMW TOYOTA MOTOR SDN BHD [2018] 8 CLJ 145
FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA
AHMAD MAAROP CJ (MALAYA), HASAN LAH FCJ, ABU SAMAH NORDIN FCJ, ZAHARAH IBRAHIM FCJ, BALIA YUSOF WAHI FCJ
[CIVIL APPEAL NO: 02(f)-18-02-2015(A)]
15 MAY 2018
HIRE PURCHASE: Hire purchase agreement – Defective goods – Motorcar – Hirer paid deposit to car dealer and obtained financing from finance company – Hire purchase agreement executed with finance company – Car suffered from serious mechanical defect – Remedy for hirer – Liability of dealer and finance company – Contractual relations between hirer and dealer – Whether superseded by hire purchase agreement – Whether dealer legally ‘supplier’ of car – Whether availing any remedy for hirer – Whether transactions governed by Hire-Purchase Act 1967 – Ahmad Ismail v. Malaya Motor Co & Anor – Whether still good law – Consumer Protection Act 1999, s. 32 – Sale of Goods Act 1957, s. 16
CONTRACT: Breach – Contract for hire purchase of car – Contractual relations – Hirer paid deposit to car dealer and obtained financing from finance company – Hire purchase agreement executed with finance company – Car suffered from serious mechanical defect – Contractual relations between hirer and dealer – Whether superseded by hire purchase agreement – Whether dealer faded out of picture once hire purchase agreement executed – Whether afforded no remedy to hirer – Whether transactions governed by Hire-Purchase Act 1967 – Ahmad Ismail v. Malaya Motor Co & Anor – Whether still good law – Consumer Protection Act 1999, s. 32 – Sale of Goods Act 1957, s. 16
Legal Network Series
NAKAMICHI CORPORATION BERHAD lwn. LO MAN HENG & YANG LAIN UNDANG-UNDANG SYARIKAT: Pengarah - Kewajipan fidusiari - Kemungkiran - Kegagalan memastikan syarikat mempunyai milikan dan kawalan dokumen-dokumen sekuriti - Kegagalan mendepositkan sijil saham sekuriti - Pengarah gagal memastikan saham sekuriti yang hilang diganti - Syarikat tidak berupaya menjual sijil saham sekuriti akibat kegagalan pengarah mengambil tindakan - Kewujudan shortfall jaminan keuntungan - Ganti rugi - Sama ada terdapat perlanggaran kewajipan fidusiari oleh pengarah - Sama ada pengarah telah meletakkan dirinya dalam keadaan percanggahan kepentingan - Sama ada pengarah telah gagal menjaga kepentingan syarikat - Sama ada jumlah shortfall jaminan keuntungan adalah memadai sebagai ganti rugi terhadap kerugian yang dialami oleh syarikat
|
|
DATO' YASMEEN MUHAMAD SHARIFF lwn. PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH HULU LANGAT UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH: Pengambilan tanah - Bantahan terhadap pengambilan - Permohonan perlanjutan tempoh untuk membuat bantahan - Keadaan khas - Kelewatan dalam pemfailan Borang N - Permohonan perlanjutan masa difailkan selepas 1 tahun - Sama ada terdapat keadaan khas untuk mewajarkan perlanjutan tempoh untuk membuat bantahan - Sama ada tempoh masa yang ditetapkan dibawah s. 38 Akta Pengambilan Tanah 1960 adalah bersifat mandatori - Sama ada terdapat keadaan khas yang mewajarkan penggunaan kuasa budi bicara Mahkamah untuk perlanjutan masa pemfailan Borang N
|
|
PWC BINA SDN BHD v. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Interlocutory injunction - Prohibitory injunction - Injunction pending disposal of dispute between parties - Ad interim injunction was granted against government - Whether temporary injunction could be granted against government by virtue of s. 29 of Government Proceedings Act 1956 - Whether an ad-interim injunction ought to be granted pending hearing of final reliefs claimed CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Injunction to restrain calling of bank guarantee - Test of unconscionability - Re-calling of bank guarantee despite court ruling in previous suit declaring calling of bank guarantee unconscionable - Bank guarantee was called on basis of absence of injunction order obtained against employer to restrain calling of bank guarantee - Whether employer could make another call on bank guarantee - Whether re-calling of bank guarantee was justified - Whether injunction application was res judicata CONTRACT: Guarantee - Banker's guarantee - Right to call for bank guarantee - Bank guarantee was called after expiry - Whether calling of bank guarantee after expiry was valid and effective - Whether calling of bank guarantee after its expiry was unconscionable
|
|
KETUA PENGARAH HASIL DALAM NEGERI v. NIMBLE SOLUTIONS SDN BHD REVENUE LAW: Income tax - Appeal - Appeal by Inland Revenue Board ('IRB') against decision of Special Commissioners of Income Tax ('Special Commissioner') - Special Commissioner allowed tax payer's appeal against assessment made by IRB - IRB refused taxpayer's entitlement to claim exemption for any increase in exports through Form J - Whether notice of assessment contravened ss. 90(1), 90(2) and 91(1) of Income Tax Act 1967 - Whether notice of assessment in Form J was wrong in law and ought to have been discharged in full - Whether taxpayer was entitled to claim relief under exemption order - Whether penalty on taxpayer had been wrongly imposed
|
|
KUMARAN KRISNA lwn. DATO' AHMAD KAMAL MD SHAHID PENGERUSI, LEMBAGA PENCEGAHAN JENAYAH & YANG LAIN UNDANG-UNDANG PENTADBIRAN: Semakan kehakiman - Certiorari - Pembatalan keputusan Lembaga Pencegahan Jenayah ('LPJ') dalam mengeluarkan perintah pengawasan polis - Kawalan dan pengawasan dikenakan terhadap orang yang telah didaftarkan tanpa sebarang penahanan - Sama ada perintah pengawasan telah memenuhi keperluan prosedur dibawah s. 15 Akta Pencegahan Jenayah 1959 - Sama ada LPJ perlu menyatakan dengan secara khusus bahawa LPJ adalah berpuas hati bahawa perintah pengawasan polis perlu dikenakan terhadap orang yang telah didaftarkan - Sama ada perintah pengawasan polis adaah sah UNDANG-UNDANG PERLEMBAGAAN: Perundangan – Kesahihan Akta Pencegahan Jenayah 1959 ('Akta 1959') - Hak seseorang yang dikenakan perintah pengawasan untuk mendapatkan perlindungan dan mengemukakan representasi untuk membela diri - Dakwaan ketiadaan peruntukan jelas berkaitan dengan perlindungan yang diperuntukkan dibawah Perkara 151(1)(b) Perlembagaan Persekutuan - Sama ada Akta 1959 selaras dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan - Sama ada Akta 1959 mempunyai perlindungan seperti yang diperuntukkan dibawah Perkara 151 Perlembagaan Persekutuan
|
CLJ 2018 Volume 8 (Part 2)
FEDERAL COURT
Ong Siew Hwa v. UMW Toyota Motor Sdn Bhd
Ahmad Maarop CJ (Malaya), Hasan Lah, Abu Samah Nordin, Zaharah Ibrahim, Balia Yusof Wahi FCJJ
(Hire Purchase; Contract - Defective goods - Remedy for hirer - Contractual relations between hirer and dealer) [2018] 8 CLJ 145 [FC]
For the appellant - N Vijayasegaran & M Mathialagan; M/s Madhi Param & Co
For the respondent - Jasmeetpal Singh; M/s Siew & Jasmeet
COURT OF APPEAL
Mohd Tahir Bahtiar & Satu Lagi lwn. PP
Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Kamardin Hashim, Ab Karim Ab Jalil HHMR
(Prosedur Jenayah - Rayuan terhadap hukuman - Sabitan bawah s. 26A Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang dan Antipenyeludupan Migran 2007) [2018] 8 CLJ 174 [CA]
Bagi pihak perayu-perayu - Mohd Fazaly Ali Mohd Ghazaly; T/n The Law Chambers of Fazaly Ali
Bagi pihak responden - Nadia Naim Mohd Tajuddin; TPR
Norol Rojik Jun v. PP
Lim Yee Lan, Abdul Rahman Sebli, Zaleha Yusof JJCA
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Murder - Whether ingredients of charge proved - Whether accused had necessary actus reus and mens rea) [2018] 8 CLJ 186 [CA]
For the appellant - Abdul Gani Zelika; M/s Johari & Amin
For the respondent - Ahmad Sazilee Abdul Khairi; DPP
HIGH COURT
Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial lwn. Yazmin Mohd Sulaiman
Hassan Abdul Ghani PK
(Undang-undang Buruh - Faedah hilang upaya sementara) [2018] 8 CLJ 203 [HC]
Bagi pihak perayu - Ooi Chih Wen; T/n Skrine
Bagi pihak responden - Tidak hadir
Mohamad Jamel Muhafiz Zamri v. PP
Ahmad Bache JC
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Possession of weapon without lawful excuse - Whether sentence excessive) [2018] 8 CLJ 209 [HC]
For the respondent - Siti Hajar Alias; DPP
For the appellant - Hasif Hasan; M/s Hasif Kumar & Co
SP Boon Seng Project v. Pengarah Tanah & Galian Negeri Kedah & Anor
Chan Jit Li JC
(Land Law - Transfer - Validity of - Whether Bumiputera lot unconstitutional) [2018] 8 CLJ 216 [HC]
For the plaintiff - SK Ng; M/s Syarikat Ng & Anuar
For the defendants - Nurulashikin Mahadzir; FC
Suruhanjaya Sekuriti lwn. Chan Chui Mei
Has Zanah Mehat H
(Prosedur Sivil - Injunksi - Tuntutan terhadap pelanggaran ss. 179, 317A dan 370 Akta Pasaran Modal dan Perkhidmatan 2007) [2018] 8 CLJ 232 [HC]
Bagi pihak plaintif - SM Shanmugam, CK Lung, Abang Iwawan (PDK) & Aina Syazwani; T/n Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill
Bagi pihak defendan - Wan Azmir, Norhazira Abu Haiyan & Alexander (PDK); T/n Hafarizam Wan & Aisha Mubarak
Tajudeen MK Syed Mohamed v. ZMS Construction
Darryl Goon Siew Chye JC
(Civil Procedure - Whether there was delay in application to set aside judgment in default) [2018] 8 CLJ 243 [HC]
For the plaintiff - M/s Amin Petra & Partners
For the defendant - M/s The Law Office of Mohanna & Co
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad v. Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Hj Abdul Razak & Ors And Another Case
Azizah Nawawi J
(Administrative Law; Constitutional Law - Appointment of third respondents as additional judges to Federal Court - Whether application frivolous) [2018] 8 CLJ 259 [HC]
For the applicant- Hanif Khatri & Ilyani Khuszairy; M/s Haniff Khatri
For the Attorney General - Alice Loke & Natra Idris, SFCs
SUBJECT INDEX
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Judicial review - Mandamus - Application for - Leave to commence judicial review proceedings - Applicant seeking order of mandamus to direct Prime Minister to advise Yang di-Pertuan Agong ('YDPA') to revoke YDPA's consent to appointment of third respondents as additional judges to Federal Court and to continue holding position as Chief Justice and President of Court of Appeal respectively - Whether applicant had clear and specific legal right to relief sought - Whether statutory duty imposed on Prime Minister to act on applicant's application - Whether application frivolous - Rules of Court 2012, O. 53 r. 3 - Specific Relief Act 1950, s. 44 - Federal Constitution, arts. 40(1), (1A) & 122B(1)
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad v. Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Hj Abdul Razak & Ors And Another Case
(Azizah Nawawi J) [2018] 8 CLJ 259 [HC]
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Judgments and orders - Setting aside - Judgment in default of appearance - Claim for monies due under construction contract - Whether there were defects and damages in house built - Failure to produce particulars or evidence to prove defects or damages - Whether any prima facie defence on merits of claim established - Whether issues that arose premature in respect of judgment in default of appearance
Tajudeen MK Syed Mohamed v. ZMS Construction
(Darryl Goon Siew Chye JC) [2018] 8 CLJ 243 [HC]
Judgments and orders - Setting aside - Judgment in default of appearance - Whether there was delay in application to set aside judgment in default - Service of judgment in default by AR registered post with AR card returned unacknowledged - Whether evidence of receipt of judgment in default - Whether application made to set aside judgment in default made beyond 30 days prescribed in O. 42 r. 13 of Rules of Court 2012 - Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s. 12
Tajudeen MK Syed Mohamed v. ZMS Construction
(Darryl Goon Siew Chye JC) [2018] 8 CLJ 243 [HC]
Judgments and orders - Setting aside - Judgment in default of appearance - Whether writ and statement of claim properly served - Whether effected by means of AR registered post - Mere denial of receipt of writ and statement of claim and absence of any acknowledgment in AR card - Whether sufficient to rebut presumption of service under s. 12 of Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967
Tajudeen MK Syed Mohamed v. ZMS Construction
(Darryl Goon Siew Chye JC) [2018] 8 CLJ 243 [HC]
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Judiciary - Appointment - Appointment of third respondents as additional judges to Federal Court and to continue holding position as Chief Justice and President of Court of Appeal respectively - Application for judicial review - Applicant seeking order of mandamus to direct Prime Minister to advise Yang di-Pertuan Agong ('YDPA') to revoke YDPA's assent to appointment of third respondents - Whether applicant had clear and specific legal right to relief sought - Whether statutory duty imposed on Prime Minister to act on applicant's application - Whether application frivolous - Rules of Court 2012, O. 53 r. 3 - Specific Relief Act 1950, s. 44 - Federal Constitution, arts. 40(1),(1A), 122B(1)
Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad v. Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Tun Hj Abdul Razak & Ors And Another Case
(Azizah Nawawi J) [2018] 8 CLJ 259 [HC]
CONTRACT
Breach - Contract for hire purchase of car - Contractual relations - Hirer paid deposit to car dealer and obtained financing from finance company - Hire purchase agreement executed with finance company - Car suffered from serious mechanical defect - Contractual relations between hirer and dealer - Whether superseded by hire purchase agreement - Whether dealer faded out of picture once hire purchase agreement executed - Whether afforded no remedy to hirer - Whether transactions governed by Hire-Purchase Act 1967 - Ahmad Ismail v. Malaya Motor Co & Anor - Whether still good law - Consumer Protection Act 1999, s. 32 - Sale of Goods Act 1957, s. 16
Ong Siew Hwa v. UMW Toyota Motor Sdn Bhd
(Ahmad Maarop CJ (Malaya), Hasan Lah, Abu Samah Nordin, Zaharah Ibrahim, Balia Yusof Wahi FCJJ) [2018] 8 CLJ 145 [FC]
CRIMINAL LAW
Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958 - Section 6(1) - Possession of weapon without lawful excuse - Weapon found on accused while committing offence of motorcycle theft - Accused sentenced to seven years imprisonment for offence of possession of weapon and one year imprisonment for offence of theft of motorcycle - Appeal against sentence for possession of weapon - Whether sentence for possession of weapon excessive - Whether sentence for possession of weapon ought to be reduced
Mohamad Jamel Muhafiz Zamri v. PP
(Ahmad Bache JC) [2018] 8 CLJ 209 [HC]
Offences - Murder - Accused convicted for offence of murder and sentenced to death - Whether ingredients of charge proved - Whether accused had necessary actus reus and mens rea - Whether trial judge considered evidence in totality - Whether findings made based on suspicion - Whether accused raised reasonable doubts on prosecution case - Whether accused ought to be convicted for lesser offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Penal Code, ss. 300, 302 & 304(a)
Norol Rojik Jun v. PP
(Lim Yee Lan, Abdul Rahman Sebli, Zaleha Yusof JJCA) [2018] 8 CLJ 186 [CA]
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Appeal - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Accused convicted for offence of murder - Accused sentenced to death - Whether ingredients of charge proved - Whether there were failures and misdirection by trial judge in conducting trial - Whether trial judge considered evidence in totality - Whether findings made based on suspicion - Whether counsel assigned by court to represent accused competent - Whether defence raised reasonable doubts on prosecution case - Whether accused ought to be convicted for lesser offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder - Whether conviction and sentence for murder charge safe - Penal Code, ss. 300, 302 & 304(a)
Norol Rojik Jun v. PP
(Lim Yee Lan, Abdul Rahman Sebli, Zaleha Yusof JJCA) [2018] 8 CLJ 186 [CA]
Sentence - Appeal against - Offences - Possession of weapon without lawful excuse - Weapon found on accused while committing offence of motorcycle theft - Accused sentenced to seven years imprisonment for offence of possession of weapon and one year imprisonment for offence of theft of motorcycle - Whether sentence excessive and ought to be reduced - Corrosive and Explosive Substances and Offensive Weapons Act 1958, s. 6(1)
Mohamad Jamel Muhafiz Zamri v. PP
(Ahmad Bache JC) [2018] 8 CLJ 209 [HC]
HIRE PURCHASE
Hire purchase agreement - Defective goods - Motorcar - Hirer paid deposit to car dealer and obtained financing from finance company - Hire purchase agreement executed with finance company - Car suffered from serious mechanical defect - Remedy for hirer - Liability of dealer and finance company - Contractual relations between hirer and dealer - Whether superseded by hire purchase agreement - Whether dealer legally 'supplier' of car - Whether availing any remedy for hirer - Whether transactions governed by Hire-Purchase Act 1967 - Ahmad Ismail v. Malaya Motor Co & Anor - Whether still good law - Consumer Protection Act 1999, s. 32 - Sale of Goods Act 1957, s. 16
Ong Siew Hwa v. UMW Toyota Motor Sdn Bhd
(Ahmad Maarop CJ (Malaya), Hasan Lah, Abu Samah Nordin, Zaharah Ibrahim, Balia Yusof Wahi FCJJ) [2018] 8 CLJ 145 [FC]
LAND LAW
Transfer - Validity of - Application to transfer land rejected on ground that land situated on Bumiputera lot - Commencement of action by way of originating summons against decision to reject application - Whether action ought to commence by way of judicial review - Whether plaintiff had locus standi to commence action - Whether defendants empowered to impose Bumiputera lot endorsement - Whether defendants acted within powers - Whether Bumiputera lot unconstitutional
SP Boon Seng Project v. Pengarah Tanah & Galian Negeri Kedah & Anor
(Chan Jit Li JC) [2018] 8 CLJ 216 [HC]
INDEKS PERKARA
PROSEDUR JENAYAH
Rayuan - Rayuan terhadap hukuman - Hukuman sepuluh tahun penjara dari tarikh tangkap bagi sabitan bawah s. 26A Akta Antipemerdagangan Orang dan Antipenyeludupan Migran 2007 - Sama ada hukuman yang dijatuhkan wajar - Faktor-faktor mitigasi - Kesalahan pertama - Berkelakuan baik - Sama ada faktor mitigasi dipertimbangkan oleh hakim bicara - Sama ada jenis kesalahan yang dilakukan serius
Mohd Tahir Bahtiar & Satu Lagi lwn. PP
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Kamardin Hashim, Ab Karim Ab Jalil HHMR) [2018] 8 CLJ 174 [CA]
PROSEDUR SIVIL
Injunksi - Permohonan - Tuntutan terhadap defendan atas pelanggaran ss. 179, 317A dan 370 Akta Pasaran Modal dan Perkhidmatan 2007 - Sama ada defendan wajar dihalang daripada berurusan dengan jumlah wang dalam akaun peribadinya - Sama ada plaintif mempunyai tuntutan yang boleh dibicarakan - Sama ada status quo jumlah wang dalam akaun peribadi defendan patut dikekalkan
Suruhanjaya Sekuriti lwn. Chan Chui Mei
(Has Zanah Mehat H) [2018] 8 CLJ 232 [HC]
Pembatalan - Writ dan penyataan tuntutan - Sama ada wajar dibatalkan - Tuntutan terhadap defendan atas pelanggaran ss. 179, 317A dan 370 Akta Pasaran Modal dan Perkhidmatan 2007 - Sama ada wujud kausa tindakan terhadap defendan - Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012, A. 18 k. 19(1)(a)
Suruhanjaya Sekuriti lwn. Chan Chui Mei
(Has Zanah Mehat H) [2018] 8 CLJ 232 [HC]
UNDANG-UNDANG BURUH
Keselamatan sosial - Faedah hilang upaya sementara - Rayuan terhadap keputusan Jemaah Rayuan Keselamatan Sosial - Pekerja menemui kemalangan - Sama ada kemalangan berlaku semasa pekerja dalam perjalanan kerja dari tempat kediaman - Sama ada kemalangan terjumlah dalam rangkuman s. 24(1)(a) Akta Keselamatan Sosial Pekerja 1969 - Sama ada pekerja layak menuntut faedah hilang upaya sementara
Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial lwn. Yazmin Mohd Sulaiman
(Hassan Abdul Ghani PK) [2018] 8 CLJ 203 [HC]
LNS Article(s)
JUDICIARY AS THE PRINCIPAL GUARDIANS OF THE RULE OF LAW* [Read excerpt]
JUSTICE DATUK DR. HAJI HAMID SULTAN BIN ABU BACKER** [2018] 1 LNS(A) lxxxivMALAYSIAN ARBITRATION (AMENDMENT) (NO 2) ACT 2018: A PRACTICAL COMMENTARY* [Read excerpt]
CRYSTAL WONG WAI CHIN** [2018] 1 LNS(A) lxxxiiISLAMIC SYNDICATED FINANCING IN MALAYSIA: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS [Read excerpt]
MOHAMAD SOFEE RAZAK* [2018] 1 LNS(A) lxxxiiiFREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN MALAYSIA: WHERE ARE WE NOW AND WHERE ARE WE GOING? [Read excerpt]
Jaganraj Ramachandran* Dr Saravanabavan Mathialagan** [2018] 1 LNS(A) lxxxv
CLJ Article(s)
BANKRUPTCY OF CLAIMANT AND REPRESENTATION UNDER SECTION 20(1) OF THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT 1967: WHETHER PREVIOUS SANCTION OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INSOLVENCY REQUIRED?[1] [Read excerpt]
ASHGAR ALI ALI MOHAMED*, FARHEEN BAIG SARDAR BAIG** & ARUN KASI*** [2018] 8 CLJ(A) ix
Principal Acts
Number | Title | In force from | Repealing |
ACT 807 | Service Tax Act 2018 | 1 September 2018 [PU(B) 508/2018] | - |
ACT 806 | Sales Tax Act 2018 | 1 September 2018 [PU(B) 506/2018] | - |
ACT 805 | Goods and Services Tax (Repeal) Act 2018 | 1 September 2018 [PU(B) 510/2018] | - |
ACT 804 | Dental Act 2018 | Not Yet In Force | - |
ACT 803 | Anti-Fake News Act 2018 | 11 April 2018 [PU(B) 174/2018] | - |
Amending Acts
Number | Title | In force from | Principal/Amending Act No |
ACT A1572 | Free Zones (Amendment) Act 2018 | 1 September 2018 [PU(B) 512/2018] | ACT 438 |
ACT A1571 | Customs (Amendment) Act 2018 | 1 September 2018 [PU(B) 511/2018] | ACT 235 |
ACT A1570 | Sports Development (Amendment) Act 2018 | Not Yet In Force | ACT 576 |
ACT A1569 | Arbitration (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 2018 | 8 May 2018 [PU(B) 265/2018] | ACT 646 |
ACT A1568 | Fire Services (Amendment) Act 2018 | 1 September 2018 [PU(B) 505/2018] | ACT 341 |
PU(A)
Number | Title | Date of Publication | In force from | Principal/ Amending Act No |
PU(A) 218/2018 | Service Tax (Compounding of Offences) Regulations 2018 | 29 August 2018 | 1 September 2018 | ACT 807 |
PU(A) 217/2018 | Customs (Amendment) Regulations 2018 | 29 August 2018 | 1 September 2018 | PU(A) 162/1977 |
PU(A) 216/2018 | Customs Duties (Exemption) (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2018 | 29 August 2018 | 1 September 2018 | PU(A) 445/2017 |
PU(A) 215/2018 | Customs Regulations (Appeal Tribunal) (Amendment) 2018 | 29 August 2018 | 1 September 2018 | PU(A) 210/2007 |
PU(A) 213/2018 | Service Tax (Rate of Tax) Order 2018 | 28 August 2018 | 1 September 2018 | ACT 807 |
PU(B)
Number | Title | Date of Publication | In force from | Principal/ Amending Act No |
PU(B) 512/2018 | Appointment of Date of Coming Into Operation | 28 August 2018 | 29 August 2018 | ACT A1572 |
PU(B) 511/2018 | Appointment of Date of Coming Into Operation | 28 August 2018 | 29 August 2018 | ACT A1571 |
PU(B) 510/2018 | Appointment of Date of Coming Into Operation | 28 August 2018 | 29 August 2018 | ACT 805 |
PU(B) 509/2018 | Appointment of Effective Date For Charging and Levying of Service Tax | 28 August 2018 | 29 August 2018 | ACT 807 |
PU(B) 508/2018 | Appointment of Date of Coming Into Operation | 28 August 2018 | 29 August 2018 | ACT 807 |
Legislation Alert
Updated
Act/Principal No. | Title | Amended by | In force from | Section amended |
PU(A) 210/2007 | Customs (Appeal Tribunal) Regulations 2007 | PU(A) 215/2018 | 1 September 2018 | Regulations 3 and 4 |
PU(A) 445/2017 | Customs Duties (Exemption) Order 2017 | PU(A) 216/2018 | 1 September 2018 | Schedule |
PU(A) 459/1998 | Free Zones (Exclusion of Goods) Order 1998 | PU(A) 202/2018 | 1 September 2018 | Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3; Schedule |
PU(A) 321/1991 | Free Zones Regulations 1991 | PU(A) 201/2018 | 1 September 2018 | First Schedule |
ACT 438 | Free Zones Act 1990 | ACT A1572 | 1 September 2018 [PU(B) 512/2018] | Sections 2, 4, 6, 21, 22, 23, 26 and 28 |
Revoked
Act/Principal No. | Title | Revoked by | In force from |
PU(A) 461/1997 | Fees (National Planetarium) Order 1997 | PU(A) 177/2018 | 30 July 2018 |
PU(A) 349/2016 | Price Control and Anti-Profiteering (Mechanism to Determine Unreasonably High Profit For Goods) Regulations 2016 | PU(A) 130/2018 | 6 June 2018 |
PU(A) 184/2013 | Ministers of the Federal Government (No. 2) Order 2013 | PU(A) 125/2018 | 10 May 2018 |
PU(A) 187/2014 | Goods and Services Tax (Imposition of Tax For Supplies in Respect of Designated Areas) Order 2014 | PU(A) 123/2018 | 1 June 2018 |
PU(A) 185/2014 | Goods and Services Tax (Application to Government) Order 2014 | PU(A) 122/2018 | 1 June 2018 |