Back to Top

CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2016, Vol 45
10 November 2016


Print this page

Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Case(s) of the Week

  1. YEO ANN KIAT & ORS v. HONG LEONG BANK BHD & ANOR [2016] 9 CLJ 207

2. Latest Cases

  1. Legal Network Series

  2. CLJ 2016 Volume 9 (Part 2)

3. Articles

  1. LNS Article(s)

4. Legislation Highlights

  1. Principal Acts

  2. Amending Acts

  3. PU(A)

  4. PU(B)

  5. Legislation Alert


CASE(S) OF THE WEEK

YEO ANN KIAT & ORS v. HONG LEONG BANK BHD & ANOR [2016] 9 CLJ 207
COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
MOHD ZAWAWI SALLEH JCA, VERNON ONG LAM KIAT JCA, ABDUL RAHMAN SEBLI JCA
[CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-02(IM)-1864-11-2015]
22 MARCH 2016

COMPANY LAW: Liquidators - Application for removal - Duty of liquidators to complete liquidation process efficiently - Inaction/delay on part of liquidators to complete liquidation process - Whether liquidators deviated from primary duty to wind-up business of company - Whether application for removal of liquidator should be allowed


LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2015] 1 LNS 629

PACIFIC & ORIENT INSURANCE CO BERHAD lwn. NOORAMANINA AZMI

PROSEDUR SIVIL: Deklarasi - Permohonan untuk - Permohonan dibawah s. 96(3) Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 - Pembatalan polisi insuran dan sijil insuran - Sama ada polisi insuran dan sijil insuran yang telah dikeluarkan kepada pihak yang diinsurkan adalah sah dan berkuatkuasa semasa kemalangan berlaku - Sama ada kelewatan dalam membuat laporan polis mempunyai sebarang implikasi terhadap kesahihan polisi insuran dan sijil insuran

[2015] 1 LNS 633

AMIN FIRDAUS NORDIN & YANG LAIN lwn. NOR HAIRIZA ABDUL RAHMAN & YANG LAIN

AKTA UNDANG-UNDANG SIVIL: Undang-undang kebankrapan - Pentadbiran aset si bankrap yang telah meninggal dunia - Sama ada aset si bankrap yang telah meninggal dunia adalah terikat dengan undang-undang kebankrapan - Sama ada ketua pengarah insolvensi adalah pentadbir aset si bankrap yang telah meninggal dunia

KEBANKRAPAN: Perintah penghukuman dan penerimaan - Pembatalan - Ketinggalan memperoleh perintah penerimaan dan perintah penghukuman yang dimeterai - Sama ada ketinggalan memperolehi perintah penerimaan dan penghukuman yang dimeterai boleh membatalkan prosiding kebankrapan - Sama ada perintah penghukuman dan penerimaan masih sah dan berkuatkuasa - Sama ada kegagalan memperolehi perintah penghukuman dan penerimaan yang termeterai merupakan satu kesalahan yang boleh dibaiki - Akta Kebankrapan 1967, s. 131 - Kaedah-Kaedah Kebankrapan 1969, k. 274

PROSEDUR SIVIL: Pembatalan - Pernyataan tuntutan - Kausa tindakan berasaskan misfeasans dan kecuaian - Tuntutan berasaskan perjalanan pentadbiran kes kebankrapan - Kewujudan isu-isu perundangan berkenaan pematuhan Kaedah-Kaedah Kebankrapan 1969 - Sama ada tuntutan plaintif telah mendedahkan kausa tindakan yang munasabah - Sama ada mahkamah dilarang daripada menentukan isu-isu perundangan sebagai merit atau sebaliknya dalam permohonan pembatalan tuntutan - Sama ada isu perundangan mewajarkan ianya dibicarakan

[2015] 1 LNS 1305

K NAGESWARY S KARUPPIAH & ORS v. SETHRA DEVI S KARUPPIAH & ANOR

TRUSTS: Constructive trust - Property - Dispute among siblings over property - Property bought by late father and registered under name of elder daughter - Whether property registered under name of defendant a trust property - Whether it was intention of late father that said property to be held in trust by defendant and to be distributed equally among all siblings - Whether defendant was holder of property in trust for her siblings

TRUSTS: Constructive trust - Breach of trust - Remedies to beneficiaries - Trustee selling trust property - Purchaser knew property was held in trust before purchasing - Whether there was breach of constructive trust by defendant - Whether purchaser who bought property knowing it was trust property could become a bona fide purchaser for value - Whether plaintiffs' beneficial interest in property retained even after property was sold to purchaser - Whether plaintiffs were entitled to proceeds of sale of property

[2015] 1 LNS 1332

LUSH DEVELOPMENTS SDN BHD v. PENTADBIR TANAH DAERAH SEPANG

LAND LAW: Acquisition of land - Compensation - Appeal against amount of compensation awarded by land administrator - Land under development at time of acquisition by state government - Market value - Whether compensation awarded by land administrator was reasonable - Whether land administrator applied correct market value in awarding compensation

LAND LAW: Acquisition of land - Injurious affection - Allegation that acquisition created obstacle to right to access - Claim for damages - Costs of constructing link bridge - Allegation of deprivation of right of access to other parcel of land and main road - Whether appellant had a valid right to access from beginning - Whether there was deprivation of right of access as a consequence of acquisition - Whether appellant could claim for compensation for loss of access

[2015] 1 LNS 1337

YB TERESA KOK SUH SIM v. THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS, MALAYSIA, YB DATO' SERI SYED HAMID SYED JAAFAR ALBAR

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Action - Claim for damages - Damages for unlawful arrest, unlawful detention and false imprisonment - Damages for severe mental anguish and pain and suffering from food poisoning - Arrest and detention under s. 73(1) of Internal Security Act 1960 ('ISA') - Whether arrest and detention was lawful - Whether arrest was carried out in a reasonable manner - Whether there were grounds to justify detention - Whether there was mistreatment during detention - Whether there was denial of constitutional rights - Whether there was denial of reasonable access to solicitors and family members

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Court - Stare decisis - Existence of two higher courts decision on interpretation of a provision of a statute - Approach to be taken by High Court - Whether High Court was bound to follow decision of Court even though decision of Court of Appeal appeared to be in conflict with decision of Federal Court

PREVENTIVE DETENTION: Detention order - Detention under Internal Security Act ('ISA') - Detention under s. 73(1) of the ISA - Arrest under ISA - Detention on ground that plaintiff had acted in a manner prejudicial to national security - Involvement in activities that caused tension and quarrel between races and religions - Whether there were grounds to justify detention under s. 8 of the ISA - Whether arrest and detention was lawful - Whether court was duty bound to inquire into sufficiency of evidence of plaintiff's involvement in prohibited activities

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: Construction of statutes - Interpretation of section 73 of Internal Security Act 1960 ('ISA') - Whether case of Borhan Hj Daud & Ors v. Abdul Malek Hussin [2010] 8 CLJ 656 stands as a valid authority on interpretation of s. 73 of the ISA


CLJ 2016 Volume 9 (Part 2)

COURT OF APPEAL

Formis Resources Bhd & Ors v. Risk Management And Safety System Pty Ltd & Ors And Other Appeals
Rohana Yusuf, Idrus Harun, Mary Lim JJCA
(Company Law; Civil Procedure - Separate legal entity - Whether there was necessity to lift corporate veil) [2016] 9 CLJ 169 [CA]

PP v. Kulandai Sepathi Raj
Zakaria Sam, Ahmadi Asnawi, Zamani A Rahim JJCA
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Reduction of charge - Whether flawed, unsupported and against weight of evidence) [2016] 9 CLJ 192 [CA]

Yeo Ann Kiat & Ors v. Hong Leong Bank Bhd & Anor
Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA
(Company Law - Duty of liquidators to complete liquidation process efficiently) [2016] 9 CLJ 207 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Pan Wijaya Property Sdn Bhd v. Big Industrial Gas Sdn Bhd & Another Case
Lee Heng Cheong J
(Contract - Frustration - Sale and purchase transaction of land conditional upon grant of consent to transfer) [2016] 9 CLJ 219 [HC]

Projek Lebuhraya Usahasama Bhd v. Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya
Asmabi Mohamad JCA
(Administrative Law - Judicial review - Certiorari - Whether highways gazetted and demarcated for use as Federal roads - Whether fell under jurisdiction of Federal Government) [2016] 9 CLJ 238 [HC]

Sarjit Kaur Tharam Singh lwn. Meena Muniandi; Majlis Peguam Malaysia (Pencelah)
Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali H
(Profesion Undang-Undang - Salah laku - Lembaga Tatatertib menambah tiga dapatan sokongan sebagai tambahan kepada dapatan Jawatankuasa Tatatertib - Sama ada memprejudis pembelaan peguam) [2016] 9 CLJ 253 [HC]

Sheela Christina Nair v. Regency Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors
Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC
(Tort; Damages; Civil Procedure - Medical negligence - Quantum of damages - Claim for medical expenses) [2016] 9 CLJ 267 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Judicial review - Certiorari - Application to quash respondent's decisions in imposing authority and encroaching into jurisdiction of applicant - Applicant authorised to develop and maintain highways and toll booths - Whether highways gazetted and demarcated for use as Federal roads - Whether fell under jurisdiction of Federal Government - Whether local government different entity from State Government - Whether respondent had jurisdiction over highways in question - Whether respondent acted ultra vires its powers - Whether toll booth a `business' defined by Local Government Act 1976 - Whether signboards put up by applicant promotional boards for commercial gains - Whether excluded from "advertisements" as defined by Local Government Act 1976 - Whether decisions of respondent suffered from infirmities of illegality and irrationality - Road Transport Act 1987, s. 85 - Rules of Court 2012, O. 53 r. 3
Projek Lebuhraya Usahasama Bhd v. Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya
(Asmabi Mohamad JCA) [2016] 9 CLJ 238 [HC]

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Costs - Claim for - Legal fees incurred by patient in obtaining court order for discovery of medical records - Whether originating summons involved surgeon as party - Whether decision to release medical records vested with surgeon - Whether claim allowed
Sheela Christina Nair v. Regency Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 9 CLJ 267 [HC]

Trial - Submission of no case to answer - Whether trial court adopted wrong test
Formis Resources Bhd & Ors v. Risk Management And Safety System Pty Ltd & Ors And Other Appeals
(Rohana Yusuf, Idrus Harun, Mary Lim JJCA) [2016] 9 CLJ 169 [CA]

COMPANY LAW

Liquidators - Application for removal - Duty of liquidators to complete liquidation process efficiently - Inaction/delay on part of liquidators to complete liquidation process - Whether liquidators deviated from primary duty to wind-up business of company - Whether application for removal of liquidator should be allowed
Yeo Ann Kiat & Ors v. Hong Leong Bank Bhd & Anor
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2016] 9 CLJ 207 [CA]

Separate legal entity - Lifting of corporate veil - Whether there was necessity to lift corporate veil - Whether directors could be made liable for claims by subsidiary company
Formis Resources Bhd & Ors v. Risk Management And Safety System Pty Ltd & Ors And Other Appeals
(Rohana Yusuf, Idrus Harun, Mary Lim JJCA) [2016] 9 CLJ 169 [CA]

Separate legal entity - Lifting veil of incorporation - Arbitration award made against subsidiary company - Claim for payment of arbitration award - Whether there was existence of scheme to deprive plaintiff of fruits of arbitration - Whether scheme comprised of merely events and matters which occurred in general scheme of doing business - Whether corporate veil of subsidiary company ought to be lifted to attach liability on directors
Formis Resources Bhd & Ors v. Risk Management And Safety System Pty Ltd & Ors And Other Appeals
(Rohana Yusuf, Idrus Harun, Mary Lim JJCA) [2016] 9 CLJ 169 [CA]

CONTRACT

Frustration - Sale and purchase - Sale and purchase transaction of land conditional upon grant of consent to transfer - Application for consent to transfer rejected - Whether contract for sale impossible to perform - Whether contract frustrated - Whether court could grant specific performance - Whether caveat lodged on land ought to be removed
Pan Wijaya Property Sdn Bhd v. Big Industrial Gas Sdn Bhd & Another Case
(Lee Heng Cheong J) [2016] 9 CLJ 219 [HC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking - Reduction of charge from trafficking to lesser offence of possession - Whether flawed, unsupported and against weight of evidence - Defence of innocent carrier - Whether established - Whether prosecution proved case of passive possession - Whether there was active act of transporting, carrying and concealing of dangerous drugs - Whether prosecution proved case of direct trafficking against respondent beyond reasonable doubt - Whether trial judge fell into serious error when reducing charge - Whether custodial sentence imposed by trial judge set aside and substituted with mandatory death sentence
PP v. Kulandai Sepathi Raj
(Zakaria Sam, Ahmadi Asnawi, Zamani A Rahim JJCA) [2016] 9 CLJ 192 [CA]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Appeal by prosecution - Reduction of charge from original charge of trafficking under s. 39B(1)(a) of Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 to lesser offence of possession under s. 12(2) - Whether flawed, unsupported and against weight of evidence - Defence of innocent carrier - Whether established - Whether prosecution proved case of passive possession - Whether there was active act of transporting, carrying and concealing of dangerous drugs - Whether prosecution proved case of direct trafficking against respondent beyond reasonable doubt - Whether trial judge fell into serious error in reducing charge - Whether custodial sentence imposed by trial judge set aside and substituted with mandatory death sentence
PP v. Kulandai Sepathi Raj
(Zakaria Sam, Ahmadi Asnawi, Zamani A Rahim JJCA) [2016] 9 CLJ 192 [CA]

DAMAGES

General damages - Pain and suffering - Physical injuries and deprivation of amenities of life - Whether lump sum award appropriate
Sheela Christina Nair v. Regency Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 9 CLJ 267 [HC]

Negligence - Medical negligence - Quantum of damages - Patient suffered severe complications after surgery performed by surgeon - Loss of income - Whether patient unable to work for 12 months post surgery - Claim for future medical treatment - Likelihood or risk of patient requiring surgical and non-surgical medical treatment - Weight of medical evidence showed patientf likely to have future surgeries - Whether reasonable and fair amount awarded
Sheela Christina Nair v. Regency Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 9 CLJ 267 [HC]

Special damages - Quantum of - Medical negligence - Plaintiff suffered severe complications after surgery performed by surgeon - Whether travelling expenses a form of special damages - Whether reasonably incurred - Whether plaintiff entitled to claim for costs of extra nourishing supplements, medical supplies and care by family members - Whether documents furnished to substantiate claims
Sheela Christina Nair v. Regency Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 9 CLJ 267 [HC]

TORT

Negligence - Medical negligence - Quantum of damages - Patient suffered severe complications after surgery performed by surgeon - Claim for medical expenses - Whether patient justified in having sought treatment at hospital in another country - Whether particular medical treatment not available at local hospital - Whether patient only entitled to one third of out of pocket expenses
Sheela Christina Nair v. Regency Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 9 CLJ 267 [HC]

Negligence - Medical negligence - Quantum of damages - Patient suffered severe complications after surgery performed by surgeon - Whether medical expenses paid by insurer ought to be recovered by patient - Whether patient incurred out of pocket expenses - Civil Law Act 1956, s. 28A(1)
Sheela Christina Nair v. Regency Specialist Hospital Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 9 CLJ 267 [HC]

INDEKS PERKARA

Profesion Undang-Undang

Tatatertib profesional - Salah laku - Jualan hartanah - Keputusan Lembaga Tatatertib memerintah perayu dibatalkan daripada Daftar Peguam Bela dan Peguam Cara - Rayuan terhadap keputusan - Alasan-alasan rayuan - Kegagalan menggubal tuduhan terhadap peguam - Lembaga Tatatertib menambah tiga dapatan sokongan sebagai tambahan kepada dapatan Jawatankuasa Tatatertib - Sama ada memprejudis pembelaan peguam - Sama ada peruntukan s. 103 Akta Profesion Undang-Undang 1976 dipatuhi
Sarjit Kaur Tharam Singh lwn. Meena Muniandi; Majlis Peguam Malaysia (Pencelah)
(Che Mohd Ruzima Ghazali H) [2016] 9 CLJ 253 [HC]


ARTICLES

LNS Article(s)

  1. NON-ARBITRAL AGREEMENTS: IS IT LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE? [Read excerpt]
    by: SHAHIN ALAM*
    MD. WHAZIHUZZAMAN**
    SHAHINA TAZRIN***
    [2016] 1 LNS(A) xcii

  2. [2016] 1 LNS(A) xcii
    logo
    MALAYSIA

    NON-ARBITRAL AGREEMENTS: IS IT LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE?
    by
    SHAHIN ALAM*
    MD. WHAZIHUZZAMAN**
    SHAHINA TAZRIN***

    ABSTRACT

    The popularity of alternative dispute resolution is undoubtedly increasing in order to solve any legal disputes, but the enforceability of ADR agreements, except arbitration clauses, has always been in doubt. It is a very crucial issue in the field of ADR whether a clause to mediate or negotiate is binding, and whether such agreement is enforceable in a court of law. The main objective of this article is to analyze how the judiciaries of different territories, particularly UK and Australia, contributed to the development of the legal enforceability of ADR agreements. It also attempts to evaluate why the legal enforcement of non-arbitral agreements was opposed, and to examine the current position with reference to recent developments. It is largely analytical in nature, and widely based on decided judicial decisions. The enforceability of ADR agreements in cyberspace (online environment) will not come within the purview of this study.

    INTRODUCTION

    Alternative Dispute Resolution refers to the wide spectrum of legal avenues that use any means other than trial to settle disputes as it is considered as alternative to litigation. There is a wide variety of dispute resolution mechanisms or processes by which a conflict is resolved without formal judicial process. The main ADR alternatives to solve disputes between the parties are negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.

    . . .

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    We are grateful to those authors or researchers whose materials were used for the purpose of writing this article. The authors would also like to express their gratitude to Prof. Dr. Syed Khalid Rashid, International Islamic University Malaysia, for giving instruction to work on the present issue.

    * Advocate, Bangladesh Bar Council Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    ** Lecturer, Dewan Idris Law College Dhaka, Bangladesh.

    *** Advocate, Bangladesh Supreme Court Dhaka, Bangladesh.


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
  3. IS JUDICIAL REVIEW A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY?* [Read excerpt]
    by: LORD DYSON
    MASTER OF THE ROLLS
    [2016] 1 LNS(A) xciii

  4. [2016] 1 LNS(A) xciii
    logo
    UNITED KINGDOM

    IS JUDICIAL REVIEW A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY?*
    by
    LORD DYSON
    MASTER OF THE ROLLS

    Your Royal Highnesses, may I begin by thanking Sultan Nazrin Shah most sincerely for his extraordinary generosity in inviting me and my wife to Malaysia and for the warmth of his welcome. We are deeply grateful and honoured to be here. May I also thank Professor Tan Sri Visu Sinnadurai for his meticulous planning of our visit and the kindness he has shown to us throughout our stay.

    Distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, it is an enormous pleasure and privilege to deliver the 29th Sultan Azlan Shah Lecture and a great honour for me to be added to the roll call of distinguished jurists who have given this prestigious lecture since 1986. The prestige of this lecture owes everything to the brilliance of His Royal Highness, Sultan Azlan Shah, many of whose judicial and extra-judicial statements about the importance of judicial review resonate with the content of my lecture. For example, in his celebrated judgment in Pengarah Tanah dan Galian v. Sri Lempah Enterprise [1979] IMLJ 135, he said: "Every legal power must have legal limits, otherwise there is dictatorship.....the Courts are the only defence of the liberty of the subject against departmental aggression". The sentiment expressed in these words should be fixed securely in the minds of all judges who are called on to decide claims for judicial review.

    . . .

    * Lord Dyson Master Of The Rolls, The Sultan Azlan Shah Lecture (November 2015). Published with kind permission of the Judicial Communications Office, Judiciary of England and Wales (https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/ wp-content/uploads/2015/12/is-judicial-review-a-threat-to-democracy-mr.pdf).


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title In force from Repealing
ACT 782 Forest Research Institute Malaysia Act 2016 1 October 2016 -
ACT 781 Redemptorist Fathers (Incorporation) Act 1962 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1962 as Act of Parliament No 16 of 1962 -
ACT 780 Bernama Act 1967 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1967 as Act of Parliament No 19 of 1967; First Revision - 1990 (Act 449 wef 26 October 1990) -
ACT 779 Legislature of Sarawak (Application of Monies Borrowed From The Federation) Act 1968 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1968 as Act of Parliament No 16 of 1968 -
ACT 778 Interest Schemes Act 2016 Not Yet In Force -

Amending Acts

Number Title In force from Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1518 Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 318
ACT A1517 Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 486
ACT A1516 National Land Code (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 56/1965
ACT A1515 Gas Supply (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 501
ACT A1514 National Anti-Drugs Agency (Amendment) Act 2016 18 August 2016 ACT 638

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(A) 292/2016 Customs Duties (Exemption) (Amendment) (No. 5) Order 2016 9 November 2016 10 November 2016 PU(A) 371/2013
PU(A) 291/2016 Audit (Amendment of First Schedule) Order 2016 9 November 2016 1 July 2016 ACT 62
PU(A) 290/2016 Local Speed Limit (Federal Roads) (West Malaysia) (Amendment) Order 2016 9 November 2016 10 November 2016 PU(A) 462/1991
PU(A) 289/2016 Malaysian Aviation Commission (Aviation Services Charges) (Amendment) Regulations 2016 1 November 2016 1 January 2017 PU(A) 100/2016
PU(A) 288/2016 Customs Duties (Tioman) (Amendment) Order 2016 31 October 2016 1 November 2016 PU(A) 239/2004

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(B) 464/2016 Notice of Proposed Revocation of Reservation of Land For Public Purpose For Town Mukim Kuala Lumpur 9 November 2016 10 November 2016 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 463/2016 Appointment and Revocation of Appointment of Registrar of Credit Reporting Agencies 7 November 2016 16 March 2016 ACT 710
PU(B) 462/2016 Notification of Values of Crude Petroleum Oil Under Section 12 4 November 2016 10 November 2016 to 23 November 2016 ACT 235
PU(B) 461/2016 Appointment of Deputy Public Prosecutor 4 November 2016 Specified in column (2) of the Schedule ACT 593
PU(B) 460/2016 Notice of Proposed Revocation of Reservation of Land For Public Purpose For Lot 36840 Mukim Petaling 1 November 2016 2 November 2016 ACT 56/1965

Legislation Alert

Updated

Act/Principal No. Title Amended by In force from Section amended
ACT 62 Audit Act 1957 (Revised 1972) PU(A) 291/2016 1 July 2016 First Schedule
PU(A) 371/2013 Customs Duties (Exemption) Order 2013 PU(A) 292/2016 10 November 2016 Schedule
PU(A) 196/2016 Road Transport (Provision of Parking Places) Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur Order 2016 PU(A) 277/2016 1 November 2016 Schedule
PU(A) 187/2014 Goods and Services Tax (Imposition of Tax For Supplies in Respect of Designated Areas) Order 2014 PU(A) 278/2016 1 November 2016 Paragraph 2
PU(A) 272/2014 Goods and Services Tax (Zero-Rated Supply) Order 2014 PU(A) 279/2016 1 November 2016 First Schedule

 

Revoked

 

Act/Principal No. Title Revoked by In force from
PU(B) 27/2015 Appointment and Revocation of Appointment of Registrar of Credit Reporting Agencies PU(B) 463/2016 16 March 2016
PU(A) 61/2010 Federal Roads (Private Management) (Collection of Tolls) (Kajang-Seremban Highway) Order 2010 PU(A) 264/2016 19 October 2016
PU(A) 79/2002 Communications and Multimedia (Rates) Rules 2002 PU(A) 185/2016 1 July 2016
PU(A) 196/2003 Market (Federal Territory of Putrajaya) By-Laws 2003 PU(A) 254/2016 11 October 2016
PU(B) 99/2014 Notice of Affirmative Final Determination of An Anti-Dumping Duty Investigation With Respect to Imports of Cellulose Fibre Reinforced Cement Flat and Pattern Sheets Originating Or Exported From the Kingdom of Thailand PU(B) 401/2016 8 September 2016