Back to Top

CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2016, Vol 42
20 October 2016


Print this page

Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Case(s) of the Week

  1. ROKIAH MHD NOOR v. MENTERI PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI, KOPERASI & KEPENGGUNAAN MALAYSIA & ORS AND ANOTHER APPEAL [2016] 8 CLJ 635

2. Latest Cases

  1. Legal Network Series

  2. CLJ 2016 Volume 8 (Part 5)

3. Articles

  1. LNS Article(s)

4. Legislation Highlights

  1. Principal Acts

  2. Amending Acts

  3. PU(A)

  4. PU(B)

  5. Legislation Alert


CASE(S) OF THE WEEK

ROKIAH MHD NOOR v.
MENTERI PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI, KOPERASI & KEPENGGUNAAN MALAYSIA & ORS AND ANOTHER APPEAL
[2016] 8 CLJ 635
COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
DAVID WONG DAK WAH JCA, VERNON ONG LAM KIAT JCA,
ABDUL RAHMAN SEBLI JCA
[CIVIL APPEALS NO: W-01(A)-67-03-2015 & W-01(A)-68-03-2015]
29 JUNE 2016

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appeal to Court of Appeal - Appellants co-authored letter that caused negative impression on Companies Commission of Malaysia - Disciplinary proceedings - Dismissal and demotion of appellants - Whether disciplinary committee complied with Statutory Bodies (Discipline And Surcharge) Act 2000 - Whether appellants entitled to protection accorded by s. 10(1) of Whistleblowers Protection Act 2010 - Whether appeal ought to be allowed

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review - Dismissal of - Appeal against dismissal of judicial review - Appellants co-authored letter that caused negative impression on Companies Commission of Malaysia - Disciplinary proceedings - Dismissal and demotion of appellants - Whether disciplinary committee complied with Statutory Bodies (Discipline And Surcharge) Act 2000 - Whether appellants entitled to protection accorded by s. 10(1) of Whistleblowers Protection Act 2010 - Whether appeal ought to be allowed


LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2014] 1 LNS 1824

PP lwn. ABDUL MUNAB ABDUL KAREEM

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH: Dadah berbahaya - Pengedaran - Anggapan statutori - Dadah dibawa dari satu tempat ke satu tempat yang lain - Pemakaian anggapan statutori untuk membuktikan milikan - Dadah dijumpai di dalam bagasi yang telah dilaporkan hilang - Perlakuan pemilik bagasi yang kembali mencari bagasi yang dilaporkan hilang - Sama ada pemilikan dadah telah dibuktikan - Sama ada anggapan statutori terpakai

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Pendakwaan - Kes pendakwaan - Pembuktian kes prima facie bagi kesalahan pengedaran dadah - Kegagalan memanggil saksi penting - Kewujudan percanggahan dalam identiti dadah - Sama ada wujud kelompangan dalam kes pendakwaan - Sama ada pihak pendakwaan telah membuktikan satu kes prima facie atas tertuduh

[2014] 1 LNS 1836

MUSA YUSOP & SATU LAGI lwn. YANG CHIK MAT ZAIN

UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH: Hakmilik - Tak boleh sangkal - Hak milik tak boleh sangkal secara tertangguh - Pertikaian berkenaan hak milik - Pemilikan hak milik secara frod - Pemilik berdaftar baru menipu pegawai pusaka semasa perbicaraan kuasa berkenaan perintah dan sijil faraid - Sama ada hak milik seorang pemilik berdaftar boleh dicabar - Sama ada mahkamah boleh mengarahkan pembatalan nama pemilik baru dalam rekod hak milik hartanah dan menggantikan dengan pemilik terdahulu - Kanun Tanah Negara, s. 340(2)

[2015] 1 LNS 1144

TAN MEI MIA & ORS v. PENTADBIR TANAH GOMBAK & ANOR

LAND LAW: Classification of land - National Land Code 1965 ('NLC') - Categorization of land - Land alienated before commencement date of NLC - Titles of lots without any specific category of use - Land falling within ambit of s. 53(3) of NLC - Proprietors of land claimed lands to be impliedly for 'building' - Whether it was necessary to apply for a variation of title pursuant to s. 124 of NLC to change category of land use from 'nil' to 'building' - Whether plaintiffs had properly utilized remedies available under the NLC

[2015] 1 LNS 1147

KEJURUTERAAN KINDENKO SDN BHD v. SERDANG BARU PROPERTIES SDN BHD & ORS

CIVIL PROCEDURE: No case to answer - Duty of plaintiff - Defendant submitted no case to answer on ground of total failure by plaintiff to discharge its legal and evidential burdens of proof - Plaintiff's claim premised upon allegation of conspiracy, fraud and tort of interference with contract - Whether plaintiff's allegations serious in nature - Whether plaintiff discharged heavy burden to prove vital elements of fraud, conspiracy and interference - Whether defendant's submission of no case to answer should be upheld

EVIDENCE: Burden of proof - Persons who allege fact to prove it - Duty of plaintiff - Absence of rebuttal evidence - Whether plaintiff duty bound to adduce all necessary and material evidence to prove primary allegations of fact on which its cause of action was founded - Whether plaintiff could rely on factual assertions in its pleadings - Whether factual assertion in pleadings could constitute proof of facts in issue notwithstanding absence of rebuttal evidence on unproven facts - Evidence Act 1950, ss. 101, 102 & 103

EVIDENCE: Proof of - Damages - Plaintiff's failure to adduce any evidence to prove damages suffered as a result of acts, omissions or conduct of defendant - Whether pleaded cause of action was actionable without proof of damages suffered - Whether plaintiff's claim sustainable

EVIDENCE: Proof of - Fraud - Standard of proof - Whether standard of proof in a civil action for fraud is beyond reasonable doubt - Whether actual fraud to be proved - Whether mere general accusation of fraud sufficed - Whether mandatory to plead particulars of fraud for claim to be sustainable

EVIDENCE: Adverse inference - Failure to call material witness - Failure to call architect - Plaintiff's case premised upon allegation of conspiracy to under-value work done and wrongful deduction of liquidated damages - Valuation of work done was approved and endorsed by architect - Whether architect was a crucial witness who ought to have been called to support plaintiff's pleaded claim - Whether an adverse inference under s. 114(g) of Evidence Act 1950 should be invoked against plaintiff

[2015] 1 LNS 1158

CHONG NAM CHING & ANOR v. PUSAT LATIHAN MEMANDU CEMERLANG BERHAD

COMPANY LAW: Winding up - Just and equitable grounds - Petition presented by minority shareholders and several contributories of company - Winding up process commenced to open door for an independent investigation into affairs of company - Loss of confidence and trust in directors and management of company - Allegation that directors had managed affairs of company for their personal interest and disregarded interest of other minority shareholders - Objection by company and remaining contributories - Whether allegations of facts which form basis of petition were true - Whether there was any misconduct or lack of probity in conduct of affairs of company to warrant a winding up to be made on just and equitable grounds


CLJ 2016 Volume 8 (Part 5)

COURT OF APPEAL

Angkutera Sdn Bhd v. Jurimba Sdn Bhd & Anor
Rohana Yusuf, Zamani A Rahim, Zaleha Yusof JJCA
(Company Law - Winding up - Liquidator - Sale of property by liquidator) [2016] 8 CLJ 597 [CA]

Malpac Capital Sdn Bhd v. Yong Toi Mee & Ors And Another Appeal
Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA
(Civil Procedure - Res judicata - Final judgment obtained) [2016] 8 CLJ 613 [CA]

MTD Prime Sdn Bhd v. See Hwee Keong & Ors And Another Appeal
Idrus Harun, Badariah Sahamid, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal JJCA
(Tort - Negligence - Contributory negligence - Determination of) [2016] 8 CLJ 623 [CA]

Rokiah Mhd Noor v. Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi & Kepenggunaan Malaysia & Ors And Another Appeal
David Wong Dak Wah, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA
(Civil Procedure; Administrative Law - Judicial review - Dismissal of - Appellants co-authored letter that caused negative impression on Companies Commission of Malaysia - Whether appellants entitled to protection accorded by s. 10(1) of Whistleblowers Protection Act 2010) [2016] 8 CLJ 635 [CA]

HIGH COURT

DJ Auto Components Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v. FBK Systems Sdn Bhd
Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JCA
(Intellectual Property - Trade marks - Registered trade mark - Infringement of) [2016] 8 CLJ 650 [HC]

Malaysian Airports Holdings Bhd v. Abdul Hamid Mydin
Collin Lawrence Sequerah JC
(Administrative Law; Labour Law - Employment - Dismissal - Medically boarded out) [2016] 8 CLJ 708 [HC]

Muhamad Elias Muhamed Yusoff v. PP
Lim Chong Fong JC
(Criminal Law - Penal Code - Sections 392 & 397 - Imposition of whipping) [2016] 8 CLJ 723 [HC]

RHB Bank Bhd v. Multi Resources Trading Sdn Bhd
Yew Jen Kie J
(Company Law - Petition - Winding up - Opposition to winding up petition) [2016] 8 CLJ 729 [HC]

Wu Siying & Ors v. Malaysian Airline System Bhd & Ors
Azizul Azmi Adnan JC
(Civil Procedure - Discovery - General discovery - Documents) [2016] 8 CLJ 740 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Judicial review - Application for - Order of certiorari to quash decision of Industrial Court - Preliminary objection - Whether application ran foul of O. 53 r. 3(6) of Rules of Court 2012 - Employee medically boarded out by company due to allegations that he was unfit to work - Industrial Court held that employee could have been assigned to a less strenuous job - Whether employee could have continued employment by making adjustments or transfers - Principle of industrial jurisprudence - Whether company failed in its obligation to continue employee's employment - Whether employee consented to being medically boarded out - Failure to call material witness - Whether adverse inference under s. 114(g) of Evidence Act 1950 invoked - Whether Industrial Court erred warranting exercise of judicial review
Malaysian Airports Holdings Bhd v. Abdul Hamid Mydin
(Collin Lawrence Sequerah JC) [2016] 8 CLJ 708 [HC]

Judicial review - Dismissal of - Appeal against dismissal of judicial review - Appellants co-authored letter that caused negative impression on Companies Commission of Malaysia - Disciplinary proceedings - Dismissal and demotion of appellants - Whether disciplinary committee complied with Statutory Bodies (Discipline And Surcharge) Act 2000 - Whether appellants entitled to protection accorded by s. 10(1) of Whistleblowers Protection Act 2010 - Whether appeal ought to be allowed
Rokiah Mhd Noor v. Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi & Kepenggunaan Malaysia & Ors And Another Appeal
(David Wong Dak Wah, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 635 [CA]

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Appeal to Court of Appeal - Appellants co-authored letter that caused negative impression on Companies Commission of Malaysia - Disciplinary proceedings - Dismissal and demotion of appellants - Whether disciplinary committee complied with Statutory Bodies (Discipline And Surcharge) Act 2000 - Whether appellants entitled to protection accorded by s. 10(1) of Whistleblowers Protection Act 2010 - Whether appeal ought to be allowed
Rokiah Mhd Noor v. Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri, Koperasi & Kepenggunaan Malaysia & Ors And Another Appeal
(David Wong Dak Wah, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 635 [CA]

Discovery - General discovery - Documents - Application for - Rules of Court 2012, O. 24 r. 3 - Information paucity - Whether documents in possession, custody or power of party against whom order for discovery sought - Whether discovery sought relevant for purposes of ascertaining liability - Whether claims made under Montreal Convention 1999 - Whether application a mere fishing expedition based on speculation - Application not accompanied by affidavit in support - Whether application failed on procedural point - Whether grounds for application baseless - Applicable test to determine whether discovery ought to be granted - Whether fulfilled
Wu Siying & Ors v. Malaysian Airline System Bhd & Ors
(Azizul Azmi Adnan JC) [2016] 8 CLJ 740 [HC]

Res judicata - Final judgment obtained - Apex court affirmed findings of trial judge - Revisiting issues after perfection of order - Whether party can re-litigate or raise issues conclusively decided - Whether decision of apex court rendered matter final
Malpac Capital Sdn Bhd v. Yong Toi Mee & Ors And Another Appeal
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat, Abdul Rahman Sebli JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 613 [CA]

COMPANY LAW

Petition - Winding up - Opposition to winding up petition - Proper procedure - Whether by filing summons in chambers supported by affidavit in support to strike out petition - Whether abuse of court process - Whether hearing of petition ought to be deferred pending outcome of summons in chambers - Companies Act 1965, s. 218 - Companies (Winding-Up) Rules 1972, rr. 28(1) & 30(1) - Rules of Court 2012, O. 18 r. 19(1) & O. 42 r. 2
RHB Bank Bhd v. Multi Resources Trading Sdn Bhd
(Yew Jen Kie J) [2016] 8 CLJ 729 [HC]

Winding up - Liquidator - Sale of property by liquidator - Appellants claiming ownership in property developed by company in liquidation - Application to vary vesting order - Test to be applied - Whether only properties legally belonging to company in liquidation could vest in liquidator - Where liquidator properly obtained vesting order - Whether applicants failed to act expeditiously to protect their alleged interest - Whether doctrine of laches applied against applicants - Companies Act 1965, ss. 233(2), 279
Angkutera Sdn Bhd v. Jurimba Sdn Bhd & Anor
(Rohana Yusuf, Zamani A Rahim, Zaleha Yusof JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 597 [CA]

CRIMINAL LAW

Penal Code - Sections 392 & 397 - Appeal against sentence - Imposition of whipping - Mandatory or discretionary - Conflict between English version and Bahasa Malaysia version of Penal Code - Whether English version prevailed over Bahasa Malaysia version
Muhamad Elias Muhamed Yusoff v. PP
(Lim Chong Fong JC) [2016] 8 CLJ 723 [HC]

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Trade marks - Registered trade mark - Expungement of - Plaintiff's marks consisting of alphabets `FBK' - Whether there was abandonment of plaintiff's FBK marks - Whether defendant had grievance cognisable in law to have plaintiff's `FBK' marks expunged
DJ Auto Components Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v. FBK Systems Sdn Bhd
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 650 [HC]

Trade marks - Registered trade mark - Infringement of - Whether plaintiff acquired goodwill and reputation of marks consisting of alphabets `FBK' - Whether defendant registered proprietor or registered user of plaintiff's FBK marks - Defendant's admission to using marks identical to plaintiff's FBK marks - Whether defendant infringed plaintiff's FBK marks under provisions of s. 38(1) of Trade Marks Act 1976
DJ Auto Components Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v. FBK Systems Sdn Bhd
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 650 [HC]

Trade marks - Registered trade mark - Passing off - Plaintiff's marks consisting of alphabets `FBK' - Whether identifying or essential features of plaintiff's marks used on goods adopted by defendant - Whether there was likelihood of confusion - Whether there was misrepresentation to public - Whether plaintiff would suffer damage by defendant's actions - Whether marks `FBK' distinctive of plaintiff's business - Whether there was passing off
DJ Auto Components Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v. FBK Systems Sdn Bhd
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 650 [HC]

Trade marks - Registered trade mark - Plaintiff's marks consisting of alphabets `FBK' - Whether plaintiff acquiesced or consented to defendant's alleged use of trade mark - Principle of estoppel - Whether applicable
DJ Auto Components Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v. FBK Systems Sdn Bhd
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 650 [HC]

Trade marks - Registered trade mark - Rectification - Whether defendant using marks in Class 16 registration as instrument of fraud - Whether would injure plaintiff - Whether marks in Class 16 registration allowed to remain on register - Whether plaintiff aggrieved person for purposes of ss. 45(1) & 46(1) of Trade Marks Act 1976 - Whether defendant's marks in Class 16 registration deceptively and confusingly similar to plaintiff's FBK marks - Whether contrary to s. 14(a) of Trade Marks Act 1976 - Whether marks in Class 16 registration registered without intention in good faith - Whether defendant's Class 16 registration should be expunged
DJ Auto Components Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v. FBK Systems Sdn Bhd
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 650 [HC]

Trade marks - Registered trade marks - Plaintiff's marks consisting of alphabets `FBK' - Deed of assignment assigning property, rights, title and interest in FBK marks to plaintiff by plaintiff's predecessor in title - Whether plaintiff bound by burden or liabilities - Whether deed of assignment valid - Whether proprietary rights in FBK mark successfully transferred to plaintiff
DJ Auto Components Manufacturing Sdn Bhd v. FBK Systems Sdn Bhd
(Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid JCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 650

LABOUR LAW

Employment - Dismissal - Medically boarded out - Employee medically boarded out by company due to allegations that he was unfit to work - Industrial Court held that employee could have been assigned to a less strenuous job - Whether employee could have continued employment by making adjustments or transfers - Principle of industrial jurisprudence - Whether company failed in its obligation to continue employee's employment - Whether employee consented to being medically boarded out - Failure to call material witness - Whether adverse inference under s. 114(g) of Evidence Act 1950 invoked
Malaysian Airports Holdings Bhd v. Abdul Hamid Mydin
(Collin Lawrence Sequerah JC) [2016] 8 CLJ 708 [HC]

TORT

Negligence - Contributory negligence - Determination of - Whether prior establishment of negligence necessary before establishing contributory negligence - Whether finding of contributory negligence justified on evidence
MTD Prime Sdn Bhd v. See Hwee Keong & Ors And Another Appeal
(Idrus Harun, Badariah Sahamid, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 623 [CA]

Trespasser - Road under construction - Use of road for construction works - Whether user could be construed as trespasser as road not gazetted as highway
MTD Prime Sdn Bhd v. See Hwee Keong & Ors And Another Appeal
(Idrus Harun, Badariah Sahamid, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 623 [CA]

Vicarious liability - Subcontractor - Use of road for construction works - Accident - Claim for damages - Whether subcontractor an independent contractor - Whether main contractor vicariously liable for negligence of independent subcontractor
MTD Prime Sdn Bhd v. See Hwee Keong & Ors And Another Appeal
(Idrus Harun, Badariah Sahamid, Harmindar Singh Dhaliwal JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 623 [CA]


ARTICLES

LNS Article(s)

  1. AMENDMENTS TO THE MAIN SECURITIES STATUTES IN MALAYSIA* [Read excerpt]
    by: KRSYTLE LUI SHU LIN [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxxv

  2. [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxxv
    logo
    MALAYSIA

    AMENDMENTS TO THE MAIN SECURITIES STATUTES IN MALAYSIA*
    by
    KRSYTLE LUI SHU LIN

    IN THIS ARTICLE, KRYSTLE LUI SHU LIN EXAMINES THE KEY CHANGES TO THE SECURITIES COMMISSION MALAYSIA ACT 1993 AND THE CAPITAL MARKETS AND SERVICES ACT 2007.

    The Securities Commission Malaysia’s (“SCM”) is the regulator of the capital markets in Malaysia and its powers are largely derived from its constituent statute, the Securities Commission Malaysia Act 1993 (“SCMA”) and the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (“CMSA”).

    The two main securities statutes in Malaysia, namely the SCMA and CMSA, were amended with effect from 15 September 2015.

    . . .

    * Published with kind permission of M/s Shearn Delamore & Co.


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
  3. RESTRAINT OF TRADE: FREEDOM TO CONTRACT v. FREEDOM TO TRADE IN THE FREE TRADE WORLD* [Read excerpt]
    by: WENDY LOW**
    LEON FOO***
    [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxxviii

  4. [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxxviii
    logo
    SINGAPORE

    RESTRAINT OF TRADE:
    FREEDOM TO CONTRACT v. FREEDOM TO TRADE IN THE FREE TRADE WORLD*

    by
    WENDY LOW**
    LEON FOO***

    Introduction

    The doctrine of restraint of trade brings to conflict two axioms of public policy - first, the freedom to contract and second, the freedom to trade. While it is in the interest of parties to be allowed to enter into arm's length agreements, it is also necessary to protect an individual's freedom to utilise his skills and craft through gainful employment. The crafting of a restrictive covenant thus involves the balance of competing public interests.

    The test for restraint of trade is relatively uncontroversial. It was succinctly summarised in the recent Singapore Court of Appeal decision of CLAAS Medical Centre Pte Ltd v. Ng Boon Ching [2010] 2 SLR 386 ("CLAAS Medical"), where it was stated at [44] that:

    . . .

    * This article was originally published in the (April/2013) issue of the Singapore Law Gazette (www.lawgazette.com.sg), the official publication of the Law Society of Singapore, published by LexisNexis. Reproduced with permission.

    ** Partner, Intellectual Property, Sports & Gaming Rajah & Tann LLP (E-mail: wendy.low@rajahtann.com)

    *** Senior Associate, Knowledge & Risk Management Rajah & Tann LLP (E-mail: leon.foo@rajahtann.com)


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title In force from Repealing
ACT 782 Forest Research Institute Malaysia Act 2016 1 October 2016 -
ACT 781 Redemptorist Fathers (Incorporation) Act 1962 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1962 as Act of Parliament No 16 of 1962 -
ACT 780 Bernama Act 1967 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1967 as Act of Parliament No 19 of 1967; First Revision - 1990 (Act 449 wef 26 October 1990) -
ACT 779 Legislature of Sarawak (Application of Monies Borrowed From The Federation) Act 1968 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1968 as Act of Parliament No 16 of 1968 -
ACT 778 Interest Schemes Act 2016 Not Yet In Force -

Amending Acts

Number Title In force from Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1518 Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 318
ACT A1517 Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 486
ACT A1516 National Land Code (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 56/1965
ACT A1515 Gas Supply (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 501
ACT A1514 National Anti-Drugs Agency (Amendment) Act 2016 18 August 2016 ACT 638

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(A) 255/2016 Licensing of Markets (Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur) By-Laws 2016 10 October 2016 11 October 2016 ACT 171
PU(A) 254/2016 Licensing of Markets (Federal Territory of Putrajaya) By-Laws 2016 10 October 2016 11 October 2016 ACT 171
PU(A) 253/2016 Customs Duties (Exemption) (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2016 7 October 2016 7 October 2016 PU(A) 371/2013
PU(A) 252/2016 Consumer Protection (Certificate of Conformance and Conformity Mark of Safety Standards) (Amendment) Regulations 2016 6 October 2016 7 October 2016 PU(A) 253/2010
PU(A) 251/2016 Excise Duties (Exemption) (Amendment) Order 2016 6 October 2016 10 October 2016 PU(A) 379/2013

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(B) 427/2016 Returns and Statements of Election Expenses 29 September 2016 30 September 2016 ACT 5
PU(B) 426/2016 Notice Regarding The Supplementary Electoral Roll For The Second Quarter of The Year 2016 That Has Been Certified 28 September 2016 29 September 2016 PU(A) 293/2002
PU(B) 425/2016 Notice Regarding The Supplementary Electoral Roll For The First Quarter of The Year 2016 (No. 3) That Has Been Certified 27 September 2016 28 September 2016 PU(A) 293/2002
PU(B) 424/2016 Notice Regarding The Supplementary Electoral Roll For The First Quarter of The Year 2016 That Has Been Certified - Corrigendum 26 September 2016 27 September 2016 PU(A) 293/2002
PU(B) 423/2016 Notification of Values of Palm Kernel Under Section 12 26 September 2016 1 October 2016 to 31 October 2016 ACT 235

Legislation Alert

Updated

Act/Principal No. Title Amended by In force from Section amended
PU(A) 491/2012 Customs (Prohibition of Exports) Order 2012 PU(A) 250/2016 1 October 2016 First and Second Schedule
PU(A) 379/2013 Excise Duties (Exemption) Order 2013 PU(A) 251/2016 10 October 2016 Schedule
ACT 753 Minimum Retirement Age Act 2012 PU(A) 249/2016 1 October 2016 Schedule
ACT 51 Dental Act 1971 PU(A) 244/2016 29 September 2016 Second Schedule
PU(A) 97/2016 Civil Aviation Regulations 2016 PU(A) 237/2016 12 September 2016 Regulations 2, 8, 35, 57A, 60A, 99, 157, 165 and 183; Part XXVI; Third Schedule

 

Revoked

 

Act/Principal No. Title Revoked by In force from
PU(B) 99/2014 Notice of Affirmative Final Determination of An Anti-Dumping Duty Investigation With Respect to Imports of Cellulose Fibre Reinforced Cement Flat and Pattern Sheets Originating Or Exported From the Kingdom of Thailand PU(B) 401/2016 8 September 2016
PU(B) 538/2010 Malaysian Code on Take-Overs and Mergers 2010 PU(B) 356/2016 15 August 2016
PU(A) 379/2012 Pensions Adjustment (Lowest Pension) Order 2012 PU(A) 188/2016 1 July 2016
PU(A) 136/2015 Highway Authority Malaysia (Incorporation) (Collection of Tolls) (East Coast Express Way-Phase 2) Order 2015 PU(A) 193/2016 15 July 2016
PU(B) 168/2013 Polling Districts, Polling Centres and Polling Hours (Amendment) (No. 15) PU(B) 197/2016 30 April 2016