Back to Top

CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2016, Vol 38
22 September 2016


Print this page

Introduction:

To get the most out of this law bulletin join CLJ Law Online now - http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=subscription

Feel free to forward this to your colleagues. Get this bulletin as email by going to http://www.cljlaw.com/?page=bulletinsubscribe


New This Week

1. Case(s) of the Week

  1. PP lwn. MOHD FADHLI KHAHARRUDIN [2016] 8 CLJ 135

2. Latest Cases

  1. Legal Network Series

  2. CLJ 2016 Volume 8 (Part 1)

3. Articles

  1. LNS Article(s)

  2. CLJ Article(s)

4. Legislation Highlights

  1. Principal Acts

  2. Amending Acts

  3. PU(A)

  4. PU(B)

  5. Legislation Alert


CASE(S) OF THE WEEK

PP lwn. MOHD FADHLI KHAHARRUDIN [2016] 8 CLJ 135
MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA, KUANTAN
HASSAN ABDUL GHANI PK
[RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: 41LB-37-12-2015]
2 JULAI 2016

PILIHAN RAYA: Kesalahan - Memiliki kertas undi luar tempat mengundi - Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954, s. 3(1)(h) - Tertuduh mendapat kertas undi buat kali kedua dan menyimpannya - Tertuduh membawa keluar kertas undi dari tempat mengundi untuk mengadu kepada polis - Sama ada niat menghalalkan cara - Sempadan atau lingkungan tempat mengundi - Akta Pilihan Raya 1958, ss. 2 & 7 - Peraturan-Peraturan Pilihan Raya (Penjalanan Pilihan Raya) 1981 - Sama ada perlu dipatuhi oleh setiap pengundi

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Rayuan - Rayuan terhadap pelepasan dan pembebasan - Rayuan oleh pihak pendakwaan - Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954, s. 3(1)(h) - Kesalahan memiliki kertas undi luar tempat mengundi - Sama ada intipati pertuduhan berjaya dibuktikan - Sama ada kes prima facie berjaya dibuktikan - Sama ada tertuduh membangkitkan keraguan munasabah terhadap pertuduhan


LATEST CASES

Legal Network Series

[2015] 1 LNS 487

MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD lwn. MOHD MUSLIM OTHMAN

UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH: Cagaran - Perintah jualan - Bantahan terhadap permohonan perintah jualan - Sebab-sebab bertentangan - Ketidak perincian baki hutang yang perlu dibayar di dalam borang 16D dan 16E - Sama ada borang 16D dan 16E telah mematuhi peruntukan s. 245(1) Kanun Tanah Negara - Sama ada jumlah terhutang yang diperincikan di dalam afidavit sokongan permohonan perintah jualan adalah memadai

UNDANG-UNDANG TANAH: Cagaran - Perintah jualan - Bantahan terhadap permohonan perintah jualan - Sebab-sebab bertentangan - Pertikaian berkenaan penyerahan borang 16D dan 16E - Serahan melalui peguam - Sama ada serahan notis 16D dan 16E kepada defendan melalui peguamcaranya adalah sempurna - Sama ada defendan yang mengetahui kandungan borang 16D dan 16E yang telah diserahkan melalui peguamcaranya boleh mempertikaikan kesahihan penyerahan borang 16D dan 16E

PROSEDUR SIVIL: Estopel - Melalui kelakuan - Pertikaian penyerahan borang 16D dan 16E Kanun Tanah Negara - Serahan melalui peguamcara - Sama ada peguamcara yang telah menerima notis tuntutan borang 16D dan 16E bagi pihak anak guamnya tanpa bantahan boleh mempertikaikan kesahihan penyerahan notis tuntutan tersebut di peringkat pendengaran permohonan untuk perintah jualan - Sama ada doktrin estopel terpakai

[2015] 1 LNS 558

PP v. M.S. LINGESVARAN SUPPRAMANIAM

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Semakan - Kuasa mahkamah tinggi - Kuasa semakan di peringkat rayuan - Ketiadaan penghakiman hakim bicara - Sama ada mahkamah tinggi boleh menggunakan kuasa semakan di peringkat rayuan dalam ketiadaan penghakiman hakim bicara

PROSEDUR JENAYAH: Rayuan - Hukuman - Rasuah - Tempoh pemenjaraan - Hukuman dijatuhkan selepas 10 tahun - Sama ada hukuman penjara 6 bulan yang telah dijatuhkan adalah memadai - Sama ada hukuman penjara untuk tempoh yang panjang sesuai dijatuhkan

UNDANG-UNDANG JENAYAH: Rasuah - Membuat kenyataan palsu - Penggunaan dokumen palsu untuk tuntutan elaun - Perbuatan penjawat awam dalam mengelirukan prinsipal dengan tuntutan palsu - Sama ada intipati kesalahan di bawah s. 11(c) Akta Pencegahan Rasuah 1997 telah dibuktikan - Sama ada tertuduh mempunyai pengetahuan dan menggunakan dokumen yang mengandungi butiran palsu untuk memperdayakan prinsipalnya

[2015] 1 LNS 898

TAN SUAN KIN v. EVELYN JUNE CHARLIE

BANKRUPTCY: Notice - Setting aside - Allegation of existence of counter claim - Whether debtor satisfied court that he had a counterclaim which equaled or exceeded amount of judgment debt - Whether failure to state existence of counterclaim in affidavit on an application to set aside bankruptcy notice was fatal - Whether it was mandatory for judgment debtor to state that he had a counterclaim that equaled or exceeded judgment debt in Form 7 to support application to set aside a bankruptcy notice - Bankruptcy Rules 1969, r. 95

[2015] 1 LNS 946

BLACK POINT DESIGN SDN BHD v. NG LEE PENG & ORS

EVIDENCE: Witness - Recalling of - Recalling of expert witness - Witness called for cross-examination to verify and ascertain certain facts stated in forensic report adduced at very last minute - Forensic reports were not available prior to commencement of full trial - Whether it was necessary to recall witness to give evidence in respect of forensic report - Evidence Act 1950, s. 138(4)

[2015] 1 LNS 952

BEKAL HIKMAT SDN BHD & ANOR v. HTM CONSULTANTS SDN BHD

COMPANY LAW: Indoor management rule - When applicable - Turquand's rule - Whether company was bound by agreement entered by directors and shareholders - Whether outsiders entitled to rely on indoor management rule - Whether persons dealing with a company in good faith were entitled to assume that acts within its constitution and powers had been properly performed - Whether outsiders who knew there was an irregularity in the company's affairs could rely on Turquand's rule

EVIDENCE: Burden of proof - Fraud - Allegation of fraud perpetrated against company by previous directors and shareholders - Unauthorized transaction by previous directors in name of company - Whether fraud had been proven


CLJ 2016 Volume 8 (Part 1)

COURT OF APPEAL

Boustead Hotels & Resort Sdn Bhd v. Basiah Jaafar & Ors
Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Ahmadi Asnawi, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat JJCA
(Civil Procedure; Labour Law - Employment - Dismissal - Constructive dismissal) [2016] 8 CLJ 1 [CA]

Karpal Singh Ram Singh v. PP & Another Appeal
Mohtarudin Baki, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Kamardin Hashim JJCA
(Criminal Law; Criminal Procedure - Sedition Act 1948 - Section 4(1)(b) - Appellant accused of making seditious comments at a press conference) [2016] 8 CLJ 15 [CA]

Karpal Singh Ram Singh v. PP & Another Appeal (No 2)
Mohtarudin Baki, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Kamardin Hashim JJCA
(Criminal Procedure - Sentence - Appeal against - Conviction under s. 4(1)(b) of Sedition Act 1948) [2016] 8 CLJ 65 [CA]

Majlis Peguam Malaysia v. Dharshan Singh Atma Singh
David Wong Dak Wah, Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid, Zamani A Rahim JJCA
(Legal Profession - Roll of Advocates and Solicitors - Restoration on Roll - Discharge of duties) [2016] 8 CLJ 70 [CA]

HIGH COURT

Mechanalysis Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation) v. Appraisal Property Management Sdn Bhd
Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC
(Arbitration; Company Law - Award - Security for costs - Setting aside) [2016] 8 CLJ 81 [HC]

MKC Corporate & Business Advisory Sdn Bhd lwn. Cubic Electronics Sdn Bhd & Yang Lain
Hadhariah Syed Ismail H
(Prosedur Sivil - Penghinaan mahkamah - Perintah komital - Permohonan) [2016] 8 CLJ 104 [HC]

Monument Mining Ltd & Anor v. Emas Kehidupan Sdn Bhd & Ors
Lim Chong Fong JC
(Contract - Rescission - Breach - Allegation of) [2016] 8 CLJ 109 [HC]

PP lwn. Mohd Fadhli Khaharrudin
Hassan Abdul Ghani PK
(Pilihan Raya; Prosedur Jenayah - Kesalahan - Memiliki kertas undi luar tempat mengundi - Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954, s. 3(1)(h)) [2016] 8 CLJ 135 [HC]

SUBJECT INDEX

ARBITRATION

Award - Security for costs - Setting aside - Mode of application to set aside award for security for costs - Whether leave of winding up court required - Whether High Court has powers to grant order for security - Arbitration Act 2005, s. 42(8)
Mechanalysis Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation) v. Appraisal Property Management Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 8 CLJ 81 [HC]

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Parties - Joinder - Appellant took over liability of wound up employer company - Appellant joined as party to proceedings by employee at Industrial Court - Whether decision binding and effective upon appellant - Whether nexus between employee and appellant established - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 29(a), 32(1)(a)
Boustead Hotels & Resort Sdn Bhd v. Basiah Jaafar & Ors
(Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Ahmadi Asnawi, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 1 [CA]

COMPANY LAW

Winding up - Security for costs - Mode of application to set aside award for security for costs - Whether leave of winding up court required - Whether application made for security for costs an action defensive in nature - Companies Act 1965, s. 226(3) - Whether applicable
Mechanalysis Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation) v. Appraisal Property Management Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Nazlan Ghazali JC) [2016] 8 CLJ 81 [HC]

CONTRACT

Rescission - Breach - Allegation of - Parties executed agreement - Whether agreement based on warranty or representation of transfer of mining lease - Whether transfer a pre-condition to agreement becoming effective - Whether a commercial risk assumed by plaintiffs - Defendants' failure to utilise best endeavours to obtain approval of transfer - Whether a non-performance of agreement - Whether plaintiffs entitled to rescind agreement - Unjust enrichment - Whether defendants should not profit from failure to fulfil agreement - Whether inequitable for defendants to retain benefit derived from agreement - Whether there was failure of consideration
Monument Mining Ltd & Anor v. Emas Kehidupan Sdn Bhd & Ors
(Lim Chong Fong JC) [2016] 8 CLJ 109 [HC]

CRIMINAL LAW

Sedition Act 1948 - Section 4(1)(b) - Appellant accused of making seditious comments at a press conference - Whether appellant questioned prerogative powers of Sultan of Perak - Whether Sedition Act unconstitutional and contrary to art. 10(2) of the Federal Constitution - Whether charge against appellant defective - Whether statements made had seditious tendency within ambit of s. 3(1)(a), (d) and (f) of Sedition Act 1948 - Whether appellant's speech intended to bring hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against Ruler of State or Government - Whether appellant succeeded in establishing defence under s. 3(2)(a) of the Sedition Act 1948 - Whether appellant denied a fair trial - Whether conviction safe
Karpal Singh Ram Singh v. PP & Another Appeal
(Mohtarudin Baki, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Kamardin Hashim JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 15 [CA]

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Appeal - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Appellant accused of making seditious comments at a press conference - Sedition Act 1948, s. 4(1)(b) - Whether appellant questioned prerogative powers of Sultan of Perak - Whether Sedition Act unconstitutional and contrary to art. 10(2) of the Federal Constitution - Whether charge against appellant defective - Whether appellant had mens rea in making statements which had seditious tendency within ambit of s. 3(1)(a), (d) and (f) of Sedition Act 1948 - Whether appellant's speech intended to bring hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against Ruler of State or Government - Whether appellant succeeded in establishing defence under s. 3(2)(a) of the Sedition Act 1948 - Whether appellant denied a fair trial - Whether conviction safe
Karpal Singh Ram Singh v. PP & Another Appeal
(Mohtarudin Baki, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Kamardin Hashim JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 15 [CA]

Sentence - Appeal against - Conviction under s. 4(1)(b) of Sedition Act 1948 - Mitigating factors - Whether considered - Whether appellant a respectable public figure - Whether sentence set aside - Whether substituted with a lighter fine of not more than RM2,000
Karpal Singh Ram Singh v. PP & Another Appeal (No 2)
(Mohtarudin Baki, Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Kamardin Hashim JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 65 [CA]

LABOUR LAW

Employment - Dismissal - Constructive dismissal - Whether established - Claim for back wages and reinstatement - Whether claimant could introduce evidence of her last drawn salary - Whether Industrial Court correct in awarding 12 months back wages - Claimant aged 58 when final award handed down - Whether claimant eligible to be reinstated - Whether award for compensation in lieu of reinstatement ought to be quashed
Boustead Hotels & Resort Sdn Bhd v. Basiah Jaafar & Ors
(Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, Ahmadi Asnawi, Vernon Ong Lam Kiat JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 1 [CA]

LEGAL PROFESSION

Roll of Advocates and Solicitors - Restoration on Roll - Discharge of duties - Advocate and solicitor committed serious acts of dishonesty and/or fraudulent conduct - Advocate and solicitor struck off Roll but restored on Roll by High Court - Restitution of monies owing made six months after application for reinstatement - Whether restitution an afterthought - Whether restitution grossly delayed - Whether advocate and solicitor truly showed repentance of past deeds - Whether fit and proper person to be re-admitted to Roll - Legal Profession Act 1976, ss. 94(3) & 107
Majlis Peguam Malaysia v. Dharshan Singh Atma Singh (David Wong Dak Wah, Umi Kalthum Abdul Majid, Zamani A Rahim JJCA) [2016] 8 CLJ 70 [CA]

INDEKS PERKARA

PILIHAN RAYA

Kesalahan - Memiliki kertas undi luar tempat mengundi - Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954, s. 3(1)(h) - Tertuduh mendapat kertas undi buat kali kedua dan menyimpannya - Tertuduh membawa keluar kertas undi dari tempat mengundi untuk mengadu kepada polis - Sama ada niat menghalalkan cara - Sempadan atau lingkungan tempat mengundi - Akta Pilihan Raya 1958, ss. 2 & 7 - Peraturan-Peraturan Pilihan Raya (Penjalanan Pilihan Raya) 1981 - Sama ada perlu dipatuhi oleh setiap pengundi
PP lwn. Mohd Fadhli Khaharrudin
(Hassan Abdul Ghani PK) [2016] 8 CLJ 135 [HC]

PROSEDUR JENAYAH

Rayuan - Rayuan terhadap pelepasan dan pembebasan - Rayuan oleh pihak pendakwaan - Akta Kesalahan Pilihan Raya 1954, s. 3(1)(h) - Kesalahan memiliki kertas undi luar tempat mengundi - Sama ada intipati pertuduhan berjaya dibuktikan - Sama ada kes prima facie berjaya dibuktikan - Sama ada tertuduh membangkitkan keraguan munasabah terhadap pertuduhan
PP lwn. Mohd Fadhli Khaharrudin
(Hassan Abdul Ghani PK) [2016] 8 CLJ 135 [HC]

PROSEDUR SIVIL

Penghinaan mahkamah - Perintah komital - Permohonan - Pengusikan dokumen yang dikemukakan di mahkamah - Sama ada dilakukan untuk menghalang dan mengecewakan pentadbiran keadilan mahkamah - Sama ada menghina mahkamah - Sama ada permohonan perintah komital harus dibenarkan
MKC Corporate & Business Advisory Sdn Bhd lwn. Cubic Electronics Sdn Bhd & Yang Lain
(Hadhariah Syed Ismail H) [2016] 8 CLJ 104 [HC]


ARTICLES

LNS Article(s)

  1. EMPLOYMENT LAW CAN AN EMPLOYER UNILATERALLY VARY SERVICE CHARGES?* [Read excerpt]
    by: WONG KIAN JUN** [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxix

  2. [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxix
    logo
    MALAYSIA

    EMPLOYMENT LAW
    CAN AN EMPLOYER UNILATERALLY VARY SERVICE CHARGES?*

    by
    WONG KIAN JUN**

    IN THIS ARTICLE, WONG KIAN JUN DISCUSSES THE CASE OF NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA V. AYER KEROH RESORT SDN BHD ON WHETHER AN EMPLOYER CAN UNILATERALLY VARY SERVICE CHARGES

    Facts

    A hotly debated issue these past few months is the issue of service charge imposed by hotels and restaurants. In the recent case of National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers, Peninsular Malaysia v. Ayer Keroh Resort Sdn Bhd, the Industrial Court considered whether Mahkota Hotel Melaka ("Hotel") could reduce the service charge imposed on customers from 10% to 5%. A collective agreement was entered into between the Hotel and the Union which had provided for the imposition of service charge of 10%.

    . . .

    * Published with kind permission of M/s Shearn Delamore & Co.

    ** Employment And Administrative Law Practice Group.


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
  3. MARITIME INTERCEPTION AND OPERATION: A REVIEW OF INTERFACE BETWEEN MULTIMISSIONED MARITIME SERVICES IN NIGERIA AND MALAYSIA [Read excerpt]
    by: ABDULRAZAQ O. ABDULKADIR, PH.D* [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxx

  4. [2016] 1 LNS(A) lxxx
    logo
    NIGERIA / MALAYSIA

    MARITIME INTERCEPTION AND OPERATION: A REVIEW OF INTERFACE BETWEEN
    MULTIMISSIONED MARITIME SERVICES IN NIGERIA AND MALAYSIA

    by
    ABDULRAZAQ O. ABDULKADIR, PH.D*

    Abstract

    Nigeria and Malaysia are two countries endowed with seas and the two countries have enacted legal frameworks and established agencies to address the menace of insecurity in ports and the maritime domains. Interestingly, the two countries are also members of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO). Both countries among other benefits charge fees on cargoes loaded or unloaded at ports and this significantly serves as a source of income, which no doubt enhances economic development. In this paper, it was observed that economic gains from the ports and maritime domain are not without their attendant risks inhibiting the fortunes derived from the seas despite legal and administrative machineries to surmount the challenges. This article considers some areas of interface, benefits and shortcomings in the legal and administrative agencies of maritime security in Nigeria and Malaysia. This article concludes by demonstrating that the legal framework in Nigeria and Malaysia on port and maritime security are virtually the same with little differences but there are a lot to be learnt from the implementation strategies of the Malaysian port and maritime security agencies especially in the areas operational strategies and provisions of basic amenities like stable electricity which is one of the panaceas to tame stowaway passengers among other insecurity in the port and maritime domain.

    . . .

    * Ph.D. (IIUM, Malaysia), LL.M (Ile-Ife, Nigeria), LL.B (Ilorin, Nigeria), BL, Lecturer, Department of Private & Property Law, Faculty of Law, University of Ilorin. Email-kor181law@gmail.com. Phone No. +2348032415849.


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.

CLJ Article(s)

  1. FIDUCIARIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DECEASED'S ESTATE: THE TWO DISTINCT CAPACITIES OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND TRUSTEES [Read excerpt]
    by: DR AKMAL HIDAYAH HALIM*
    NOR AZLINA MOHD NOOR**
    [2016] 8 CLJ(A) i CLJ 2016 Volume 8 (Part 1)

  2. [2016] 8 CLJ(A) i
    logo
    MALAYSIA

    FIDUCIARIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DECEASED'S ESTATE:
    THE TWO DISTINCT CAPACITIES OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND TRUSTEES

    by
    DR AKMAL HIDAYAH HALIM*
    NOR AZLINA MOHD NOOR**

    Introduction

    Personal representative is one of the most important figures in the dramatis personae, a drama in human relationships that normally involves elements of struggle, plight, honesty and fraud in the administration of a deceased's estate. This is due to the fact that upon a person's death, his estate does not simply glide between his legal heirs but instead enters into a kind of limbo. Thus, the office of personal representative requires a person who must at the utmost ensure himself to have a solemn understanding of his duties and obligations. A personal representative is in a fiduciary relationship with the estate beneficiaries; a relationship which undeniably encompasses many essential elements of trust. The personal representative is held to the highest degree of good faith in performing his duties and owes fiduciary responsibility to the estate beneficiaries[1].

    In the process of estate administration, one question that has nagged the office of personal representative is that what should be the two distinct capacities of personal representative and trustee since the element of trust is part and parcel of the duties and obligation imposed on the personal representative. In addition, the expression of trustee under the Malaysian Trustee Act 1949 includes the duties incidental to the office of a personal representative. As the role of a personal representative is quite distinct from that of a trustee and is subject to different legal framework and liability, this paper aims to examine the legal position of a personal representative and to identify the line separating the duties of a personal representative from his duties as a trustee. The discussion includes an analysis of the relevant statutory provisions and also the decided cases in order to identify the distinction between the offices of a personal representative to that of a trustee in the administration of the deceased's estate.

    . . .

    * Associate Professor, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia.

    ** Lecturer, School of Law, College of Law, Government & International Studies University Utara Malaysia.


    Please subscribe to cljlaw or login for the full article.
LEGISLATION HIGHLIGHTS

Principal Acts

Number Title In force from Repealing
ACT 781 Redemptorist Fathers (Incorporation) Act 1962 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1962 as Act of Parliament No 16 of 1962 -
ACT 780 Bernama Act 1967 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1967 as Act of Parliament No 19 of 1967; First Revision - 1990 (Act 449 wef 26 October 1990) -
ACT 779 Legislature of Sarawak (Application of Monies Borrowed From The Federation) Act 1968 (Revised 2016) 15 September 2016 pursuant to paragraph 6(1)(xxiii) of the Revision of Laws Act 1968 [Act 1]; Revised up to 1 September 2016; First enacted in 1968 as Act of Parliament No 16 of 1968 -
ACT 778 Interest Schemes Act 2016 Not Yet In Force -
ACT 777 Companies Act 2016 Not yet in force -

Amending Acts

Number Title In force from Principal/Amending Act No
ACT A1518 Strata Titles (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 318
ACT A1517 Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 486
ACT A1516 National Land Code (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 56/1965
ACT A1515 Gas Supply (Amendment) Act 2016 Not Yet In Force ACT 501
ACT A1514 National Anti-Drugs Agency (Amendment) Act 2016 18 August 2016 ACT 638

PU(A)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(A) 238/2016 Road Transport (Prohibition of Use of Road) (City of Kuala Lumpur) (No. 3) Order 2016 9 September 2016 15 September 2016 ACT 333
PU(A) 237/2016 Civil Aviation (Amendment) Regulations 2016 9 September 2016 12 September 2016 PU(A) 97/2016
PU(A) 236/2016 Communications and Multimedia (Numbering) Regulations 2016 9 September 2016 10 September 2016 ACT 588
PU(A) 235/2016 Capital Markets and Services (Capital Market Compensation Fund) (Contribution) (Amendment) Regulations 2016 6 September 2016 7 September 2016 PU(A) 482/2012
PU(A) 234/2016 Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities (Declaration of Specified Entities and Reporting Requirements) (Amendment) Order 2016 5 September 2016 6 September 2016 PU(A) 93/2014

PU(B)

Number Title Date of Publication In force from Principal/ Amending Act No
PU(B) 404/2016 Temporary Exercise of Ministerial Functions 9 September 2016 10 September 2016 ACT 388
PU(B) 403/2016 Appointment of Assistant Registrars 9 September 2016 20 July 2016 ACT 685
PU(B) 402/2016 Appointment of Registrar 9 September 2016 5 June 2016 ACT 685
PU(B) 401/2016 Notice of Affirmative Final Administrative Review Determination of An Anti-Dumping Duty With Regard To The Imports of Cellulose Fibre Reinforced Cement Flat and Pattern Sheets Originating or Exported From The Kingdom of Thailand In Respect of Mahaphant Fibre-Cement Public Company Limited 7 September 2016 8 September 2016 ACT 504
PU(B) 400/2016 Appointment of Notary Public 6 September 2016 Specified in column (3) of the Schedule ACT 115

Legislation Alert

Updated

Act/Principal No. Title Amended by In force from Section amended
PU(A) 482/2012 Capital Markets and Services (Capital Market Compensation Fund) (Contribution) Regulations 2012 PU(A) 235/2016 7 September 2016 Schedule 1
PU(A) 93/2014 Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities (Declaration of Specified Entities and Reporting Requirements) Order 2014 PU(A) 234/2016 6 September 2016 First Schedule
PU(A) 437/2010 Capital Markets and Services (Dispute Resolution) Regulations 2010 PU(A) 233/2016 5 September 2016 Regulations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13A, 14 and 15; Schedule 2
PU(A) 184/2013 Ministers of the Federal Government (No. 2) Order 2013 PU(A) 228/2016 28 June 2016 Schedule
PU(A) 437/1985 Food Regulations 1985 PU(A) 227/2016 1 September 2016 Regulations 2 and 19

 

Revoked

 

Act/Principal No. Title Revoked by In force from
PU(B) 99/2014 Notice of Affirmative Final Determination of An Anti-Dumping Duty Investigation With Respect to Imports of Cellulose Fibre Reinforced Cement Flat and Pattern Sheets Originating Or Exported From the Kingdom of Thailand PU(B) 401/2016 8 September 2016
PU(B) 538/2010 Malaysian Code on Take-Overs and Mergers 2010 PU(B) 356/2016 15 August 2016
PU(A) 379/2012 Pensions Adjustment (Lowest Pension) Order 2012 PU(A) 188/2016 1 July 2016
PU(A) 136/2015 Highway Authority Malaysia (Incorporation) (Collection of Tolls) (East Coast Express Way-Phase 2) Order 2015 PU(A) 193/2016 15 July 2016
PU(B) 168/2013 Polling Districts, Polling Centres and Polling Hours (Amendment) (No. 15) PU(B) 197/2016 30 April 2016